Fallout 4: London ?

Ideas people Good or Bad ??

Very good idea, i'd buy that.

Would be good if they could do the same as they did with the previous Fallout where they choose a certain decade rather than using present-day. That way we could have post-apocalyptic 1960's London which would be groovy.
 
Why would the bombs need to start falling to be able to make this? Everyone knows everything north of Watford is an apocalyptic wasteland, full of mutants, crumbling buildings and burnt out vehicles anyway, so they could just set it in present day ;)
 
it doesn't really matter to me, because this game will still suck.

1...... it kept crashing
2...... it's not really a shooter, it's an RPG with awkward controls, in fact sorry, the guns are totally crap.

but the game did look brilliant and the music was cool too
 
Bugs me that so many post-apocalypse games are set in America.

The atmosphere in Hellgate was fantastic, despite its other flaws, and in movies, stuff like 28 Days Later resonates a lot more because its so close to home.

Give me Fallout London before any nuked 50's America any day.


This, although I think that a chunk of why it failed was london as well.
 
I love the idea, would be awesome, but of course won't happen (well, most likely) :(

And yeah New Vegas looked horrible and was a terrible game IMO.

I still play FO3 on a regular basis, love it :)
 
In one of the FO3 missions based around Rivet City (about a robot I think), there was a lot of talk about the 'Commonwealth'. Not our Commonwealth but one based around some Northern US states. I remember thinking at the time that this was a loose thread left dangling for a DLC or a future game.

I could definitely live with Fallout: London though (as long as they don't go down the Dick van Dyke 'cockernee geezer' localization route)
 
Back
Top Bottom