FAO CCNA students

Garp said:
Hardest part I'm finding at the moment is having recent (passed last october) CCNA credentials and 6+ years networking support experience.. but none of it having been in a Cisco environment. No one seems to want to employ me in a networking role :(

It's tough one, and is usually a case of finding a role in a place where there is both Cisco gear and whatever you are experienced in. I've been turned down for jobs because I've no Juniper experience etc.
 
Garp said:
Hardest part I'm finding at the moment is having recent (passed last october) CCNA credentials and 6+ years networking support experience.. but none of it having been in a Cisco environment. No one seems to want to employ me in a networking role :(
Sounds like you need a better agency on the case, there's loads for CCNA people in London at the moment.
 
I grasped subnetting from the Sybex book for 70-216 (network infrastructure, win2k). Also, if your doing the CCNA - the trainsignal lab for Cisco routing is very good, has a great subnetting lecture AND has a pdf full of practice questions and walkthroughs. Good luck ;)
 
im doing ccna atm. passed ccna 1 and 2 by literally knowing sweet fa. if i was put into a job based on it i'd be screwed, good thing i hate it and would never consider getting a job in it :D
 
yea ive just passed ccna 1, i found subnetting to be quite a head ****. took me a ages to get my loaf round it. I bought the offical cisco book (bible) it comes with a cd i found that to quite useful :)
If your at uni just ask the lectures to go over it agin, i did :)

Watch your language.

Otacon
 
Im at college doing the CCNA, and have passed 1+2 now on the 3rd semester, the subnetting i found was incredibly hard, i found the lecturer didnt explain it too well and i had to spend about 3-4hours at home, reading over websites and doing examples until i finally had cracked it, now its trying to get my head round VLSM's :/

/Gigi
 
Gigi said:
Im at college doing the CCNA, and have passed 1+2 now on the 3rd semester, the subnetting i found was incredibly hard, i found the lecturer didnt explain it too well and i had to spend about 3-4hours at home, reading over websites and doing examples until i finally had cracked it, now its trying to get my head round VLSM's :/

/Gigi

See the link I posted above, explains it from first principals in a very easy to understand way.
 
I remember lectures at uni or subnetting were worthless to me. Absolutley no understanding of what was going on at all. I pick up the ccna intro book, read through the subnetting chapter once and fully understand the concepts. After attemptings the questions a few times I understand it even better.

Everyones got their own way to learn it I guess.

Need to sit my Intro exam but keep putting it off.
 
Nozzer said:
Sounds like you need a better agency on the case, there's loads for CCNA people in London at the moment.

"With commercial experience" thats the key part. Over the last two months I've applied to over 100 jobs in London, and the only ones that haven't required commercial experience have ended up going to "an internal appointment". Its getting a tad bit irritating, and oddly familiar every time.
 
Nozzer said:
Do it in one exam, it's easier.

So I'm told but I'd rather get one out the way then read the second book and do the next. May mean more questions on each topic but I think I'm prepared for that.
 
I just decided to do the CCNA, got some books, got a good simulator and passed the CCNA 640-801. Subnetting is easy once it clicks, then Wildcard Masks needs to be tackled, the OSPF, EIGRP etc etc
Worth it though, i have a good job now
 
Nozzer said:
Do it in one exam, it's easier.

I shoulda really ask why its easier in one rather than dismissing your response.

If you think its easier then that may benefit me. Could you explain how you found that to be easier?
 
I thought that I'd rather have one exam, with questions on half the maetrial from each book, than two exams, each with questions on all the material from each book. If that makes sense.

The single exam I took was heavily biased towards the ICND parts anyway, a lot of fault finding and configuration questions. I think I had one subnetting question.
 
Nozzer said:
I thought that I'd rather have one exam, with questions on half the maetrial from each book, than two exams, each with questions on all the material from each book. If that makes sense.

The single exam I took was heavily biased towards the ICND parts anyway, a lot of fault finding and configuration questions. I think I had one subnetting question.

Yea I read that the single exam will be mainly based on the ICND book.

I guess I'll give it a thought and figure out which to do.
 
Back
Top Bottom