• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Far Cry 2 1680 x 1050 max settings Top List ***

System in my sig

DX9:
fc2dx9aq9.jpg


DX10:
fc2dx10cg4.jpg
 
cant be botherd to screenshot but heres my crossfire one

* Total Frames: 1110, Total Time: 15.07s
* Average Framerate: 73.64
* Max. Framerate: 81.36 (Frame:929, 12.46s)
* Min. Framerate: 61.13 (Frame:1107, 15.04s)
 
And @ 1920x1200 with AA 8x:

fc2dx10x8zr2.jpg


To be fair at 1920x1200 res i can never tell the difference between no AA and 8x AA, so i never see the point of having any AA in games, i guess if you stopped th game and had a real close look you might be able to spot the difference between no AA and 8x, but when the game is in motion you'd never tell
 
Anyone else getting better performance with dx10? Im using exactly the same settings (ultra high and 1680*1050) except for hdr being greyed out in dx10.

Just have 2 runs with identical settings and you'll get a graph comparing the average of both runs in a graph.
 
Last edited:
As for the benchmark, I got 48fps at 1680x1050 with 0xAA.

Then I tried 1920x1200 with 8xAA...and got 48fps.

Same thing happened to me in the Warhead thread.
Cba to post the actual result on the chart as its pretty poor.
 
Back
Top Bottom