'completed' at last, ok game but not sure why it gets huge amount of praise. Tomb Raider, Max Payne 3 and Hitman Absolution were all more enjoyable for me
FC3 is great for snipering and stealth at enemy camps, but walking from camp to camp is a bit of a bore, it's all the same, there's nothing to do, you just stroll around admiring the view and shooting at Dingos!
the enemy camps are ok but too small, i would have half of these much larger and throw in a mountain top Fortress, a Harbour, a massive ammo dump and a huge research facility, just to add variety.
Go hunting! I would have loved a massive ammo dump too.
That's weird. Far Cry 3 looked pretty good on my system and the biggest difference between our systems is your processor is newer than mine and running a lot faster. Have you got the latest drivers for your graphics card? Are you leaving other programs running in the background?Can anyone offer any advice on how to get the game running stutter free? My specs in my signature.
On mostly high settings, the game looks pretty ugly in places and doesn't run great.
Can anyone offer any advice on how to get the game running stutter free? My specs in my signature.
On mostly high settings, the game looks pretty ugly in places and doesn't run great.
it seems to me that your card is a bit short of power...but i'm not sure though
when i play and i'm in a busy fight the fans speed up quite a lot, it doesn't like it (even OCd ), but in any other game the pc is silent...but i'm not sure about Crysis. it's a bit odd though, because it's only grass/plants and sky, i cant see why it's so graphic intensive, but it definitely is.
When you say short of power, do you mean I need a better gfx card?
it seems to me that your card is a bit short of power...but i'm not sure though
when i play and i'm in a busy fight the fans speed up quite a lot, it doesn't like it (even OCd ), but in any other game the pc is silent...but i'm not sure about Crysis. it's a bit odd though, because it's only grass/plants and sky, i cant see why it's so graphic intensive, but it definitely is.
When you say short of power, do you mean I need a better gfx card?
I doubt that's the case. I'm running the game with a 7870, only slightly faster than his card but I'm driving a 2560x1440 monitor, game's running flawlessly. His monitor is 1920x1080, which is only 56% the number of pixels
Other than the slight difference in Graphics card, the only thing in your PC that isn't faster or better than mine is that I have 32GB of ram to your 8GB. Try adding more ram if you can?
Put post processing to low, better IQ and 50% fps boost for me. It's bugged apparently
Can PC games actually use more than 8GB RAM? :|
any news on FC4 yet?
A 64-bit executable can allocate 2GB of static memory and up to 8TB of dynamic memory. Aside from that, Bare in mind that all the other memory-using applications on your computer don't disappear when you're running a game, unless you close them first of course.
Generally speaking, I've found that the more RAM a system has, the better it functions. I found there was a noticeable but not substantial improvement in overall smoothness going from 16GB to 32GB as even less data got paged out to disk.
<edit>
Apparently FC3's executable is only 32-bit. Please disregard statements about 64-bit.
A 64-bit executable can allocate 2GB of static memory and up to 8TB of dynamic memory. Aside from that, Bare in mind that all the other memory-using applications on your computer don't disappear when you're running a game, unless you close them first of course.
Generally speaking, I've found that the more RAM a system has, the better it functions. I found there was a noticeable but not substantial improvement in overall smoothness going from 16GB to 32GB as even less data got paged out to disk.
<edit>
Apparently FC3's executable is only 32-bit. Please disregard statements about 64-bit.