fastest speed reached by man?

Was reading in a science textbook about scramjets a while ago, they had one going 6000+mph and when you work it out it is over 2 miles per second, which is an utterly unbelievable speed, and to think that the re-entry speeds are waaay over that is just...wow.
 
would the just be crushed under the pressure if the acceleration was to fast? :eek:

yep.
Vertical axis g-force

Aircraft, in particular, exert g-force along the axis aligned with the spine. This causes significant variation in blood pressure along the length of the subject's body, which limits the maximum g-forces that can be tolerated.

In aircraft, g-forces are often towards the feet, which forces blood away from the head; this causes problems with the eyes and brain in particular. As g-forces increase brownout/greyout can occur, where the vision loses hue. If g-force is increased further tunnel vision will appear, and then at still higher g, loss of vision, while consciousness is maintained. This is termed "blacking out". Beyond this point loss of consciousness will occur, sometimes known as "g-loc" ("loc" stands for "loss of consciousness"). While tolerance varies, a typical person can handle about 5 g (49m/s²) before g-loc'ing, but through the combination of special g-suits and efforts to strain muscles—both of which act to force blood back into the brain—modern pilots can typically handle 9 g (88 m/s²) sustained (for a period of time) or more (see High-G training).

Resistance to "negative" or upward gees, which drive blood to the head, is much lower. This limit is typically in the −2 to −3 g (−20 m/s² to −30 m/s²) range. The subject's vision turns red, referred to as a red out. This is probably because capillaries in the eyes swell or burst under the increased blood pressure.

Humans can survive up to about 20 to 35 g instantaneously (for a very short period of time). Any exposure to around 100 g or more, even if momentary, is likely to be lethal, although the record is 179 g.[2] It has also been said that the height of a person can be shortened if high g-force is sustained for a continuos amount of time.
 
Im going to play mediator on this and say that space shuttle stuff outside, or re-entering our atmosphere doesnt count. If were going to count speeds like that then were goign to need to count things like our rotation of earth, and the speed of our galaxy. How about looking for the fastest speed someone has been using solely artificial propultion. i.e. if they stopped they would be stationary in relation to the earth, and are not under any other accelerative forces (mavity, rotation of the earth etc). Basically the fastest someone has been in our atmpsphere under artificial propultion.
 
Im going to play mediator on this and say that space shuttle stuff outside, or re-entering our atmosphere doesnt count. If were going to count speeds like that then were goign to need to count things like our rotation of earth, and the speed of our galaxy. How about looking for the fastest speed someone has been using solely artificial propultion. i.e. if they stopped they would be stationary in relation to the earth, and are not under any other accelerative forces (mavity, rotation of the earth etc). Basically the fastest someone has been in our atmpsphere under artificial propultion.

The space shuttle
The Space Shuttle reaches around Mach 23 during launch and re-enters at around 25.

So it still wins at launch.
 
Was reading in a science textbook about scramjets a while ago, they had one going 6000+mph and when you work it out it is over 2 miles per second, which is an utterly unbelievable speed, and to think that the re-entry speeds are waaay over that is just...wow.

Yeah, scramjets are pretty incredible. The only problem being that in order to operate as a scramject the minimum speed is something like mach 6, anything below requires an active compressor so it basically needs a conventional jet engine/rocket to get it to those speeds first.
 
Why can't you go faster than the speed of light, whats stopping us? Granted physics, but physics have been proved wrong before.

Ok, scenario, travelling at the speed of light, we increase our speed by 1mph, what would happen?
 
Ok, scenario, travelling at the speed of light, we increase our speed by 1mph, what would happen?

You can't according to our understanding of physics.
The faster you go the more mass you have. As you approach the speed of light your mass is infinite. So to increase the speed of the mass you would need unlimited power.
 
Why can't you go faster than the speed of light, whats stopping us? Granted physics, but physics have been proved wrong before.

Ok, scenario, travelling at the speed of light, we increase our speed by 1mph, what would happen?

theoretically when you reach the speed of light your mass becomes infinate so, who knows...
 
would the just be crushed under the pressure if the acceleration was to fast? :eek:

That happens regardless of speed. If you were to hit a brick wall at several hundred miles per hour then you'd still decelerate to zero in a matter of miliseconds. The forces required to do this will kill you :)
 
Last edited:
Ok, scenario, travelling at the speed of light, we increase our speed by 1mph, what would happen?

It's more complex than that, you can't just "increase our speed by 1mph".

As you near the speed of light (say 0.9990e) things get funky, your mass increases, the distance between you and where you are going becomes shrunken, and time passes faster (from your perspective).

If you increase power, you'll get a little closer, say 0.9991e, and these odd effects happen more so.

If you increase power again, you get a little bit closer still, but you will never reach the speed of light.




Quirky fact: If you accelerated away at 10m/s/s (inducing normal mavity) for 5 years, then decelerated for 5 years, then accelerated the other way for 5 years, and decelerated for 5 years; you would have been to the other side of the galaxy and back. And you would be 20 years older, but here on earth, about 10,000 years would have passed by.


Another one: The Doppler effect happens on light too, a fast object approaching will appear red, and when departing it will appear blue. Same was a passing car goes Neeeeeeeeeeeeouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum.
 
Last edited:
Ok thanks i understand now, star wars/trek lies :(

Proposed spacecraft methods that may violate the laws of physics


In addition, a variety of hypothetical propulsion techniques have been considered that would require entirely new principles of physics to realize and that may not actually be possible. To date, such methods are highly speculative and include:

* Diametric drive
* Pitch drive
* Bias drive
* Disjunction drive
* Alcubierre drive (a form of Warp drive)
* Differential sail
* Wormholes - theoretically possible, but impossible in practice with current technology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft_propulsion
It's about two thirds of the way down. Can click on each one to read more
 
Vertical axis g-force

Aircraft, in particular, exert g-force along the axis aligned with the spine. This causes significant variation in blood pressure along the length of the subject's body, which limits the maximum g-forces that can be tolerated.

In aircraft, g-forces are often towards the feet, which forces blood away from the head; this causes problems with the eyes and brain in particular. As g-forces increase brownout/greyout can occur, where the vision loses hue. If g-force is increased further tunnel vision will appear, and then at still higher g, loss of vision, while consciousness is maintained. This is termed "blacking out". Beyond this point loss of consciousness will occur, sometimes known as "g-loc" ("loc" stands for "loss of consciousness"). While tolerance varies, a typical person can handle about 5 g (49m/s²) before g-loc'ing, but through the combination of special g-suits and efforts to strain muscles—both of which act to force blood back into the brain—modern pilots can typically handle 9 g (88 m/s²) sustained (for a period of time) or more (see High-G training).

oh dear
 
Back
Top Bottom