Permabanned
That's a good set of rates
izeetle used to have a sliding scale so it was 2.75% for small traders. Now it's a fixed 1.75% with their latest plans. On a 5 pound buy that's 9p. If your margin is 9p your bussiness is going to struggle! Just stick a minimum spend of 5 or 10 and job done? My mum was using paypal here and izeetle now and it's actually pretty good for her usecase. Izeetle is surprisingly reliable and now takes contactless!
I do think it's a bit unfair because a CC vendor (let's say AMEX) can jack their fees up and offer rewards to their customers. Simple solution vendors just ban such CC vendors.
Afaik izeetle is more 'expensive' fee wise compared to more traditional methods used in shops but there's no fees, minimums etc just the (small) cost of the device and transaction fees.
I don't think izettle ever had a per transaction charge. Also there is square which is just as goodIf it's really that low now, then that's an acceptable fee structure.
Last time I looked, for visa specifically... it was even as high as a base price of 50p per transaction + 1-3%
It did depend on the deal of the provider though and it could vary quite a bit.
If it's really that low now, then yes - no problem with it and they shouldn't be profiteering from it, not at all... all I'd be bothered about is covering the costs.
I'd be OK with a minimum spend... most of the places I've dealt with over the last years did that anyway... so it was a minimum spend of £5 or £10 for no fee... otherwise less than that, they'd charge 50p... I don't see any issue with that. Now maybe they just specify a minimum spend if their fees are higher than the offer you've posted, I'd be OK with that.
Exactly I have demonstrated that it takes all of five seconds to get a percentage charge for card processing that's relatively low.Nobody get's charged 3-5% on a personal credit card. I can get rates down to 0.43%.
If the merchant can't be arsed to shop around why should the consumer pay?