Yes. They're both sculpted purely for aesthetics. If they weren't they wouldn't look like pretty boy on the left, or absolutely ridiculous like the guy on the right.
Female body builders, just why?
- Thread starter HNR1
- Start date
Yes. They're both sculpted purely for aesthetics. If they weren't they wouldn't look like pretty boy on the left, or absolutely ridiculous like the guy on the right.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
lolkwerk. You mean it doesn't fit into your stereotype unless you take steroids and look like a freak?
Are you serious..? You are really going to compare these pictures as being similar? I think i'm done here.
First guy: physique model
Second guy: BODYBUILDER
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
I'm sure he is far more agile and has a massively higher level of fitness than a huge proportion of people in this country who struggle for breath after a flight of stairs.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
There's nothing to disagree on about that. Its an obvious fact and a mute point.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
I'm sure a pizza scoffing beer gut chap will do it much better wont he
It's ok, at least obese people get to be part of a statistic
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
the bodybuilders who you are talking about, the ones who go the extra mile, are most likely using chemical substances to do so.
their is a big difference between them and natural bodybuilders.
i can guarantee you 90%+ of the male population in the UK wishes they looked similar to the below bodybuilder
http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/photos/view-user-photo/9891862
this is the first guy i saw on their, i never picked him out, he is just an average bodybuilder.
guys who say they wish they didnt look like that are kidding themselves on, just like women who say they dont wanna look like nicole scherzinger.
the reason why you see guys with muscles and six packs in every advert for calvin klein underwear or some aftershave or a diesel advert, because that is what the average male aspires to be like.
You're not a bodybuilder unless you take steroids because it's IMPOSSIBLE without them. The human body can't maintain that much mass without extra chemicals. Without drugs you don't look like anything special. You look like a recreational weight lifter because that's what you are.
There's nothing wrong with steroids IMO you should be able to get them from your GP. I mean those transgenders weirdos can get legal hormone therapy to change sex so they can feel good about their body, why can't bodybuilders?
I'm sure a pizza scoffing beer gut chap will do it much better wont he
It's ok, at least obese people get to be part of a statistic
Whatever
You seen many scaffholders/labourers?
No, didn't think so
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
ITT building your body isn't bodybuilding
Kwerk is infact correct.
Bodybuilders take more drugs in one day than an average person would do in a year. Several jars of pills, protein, creatine, insulin and yes... Steroids.
Lots of steroids. You can't get like that without them or you're just not a body builder.
Bodybuilders take more drugs in one day than an average person would do in a year. Several jars of pills, protein, creatine, insulin and yes... Steroids.
Lots of steroids. You can't get like that without them or you're just not a body builder.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
ITT protein is a drug. No one is denying professional bodybuilders take steroids.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
lol, ridiculous statement made by another guy who has no clue about bodybuilding or steroids.
what if you take HGH and pro hormones?
yet the guy on the right manages to lift 200kg's fine, yet cannot lift his hand? does not compute
you do know both of them are bodybuilders and both have used steroids right? making you completely wrong again.