Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2008
- Posts
- 1,757
Cloud storage of the Dropbox type would be the best for what you want to achieve - the synced folders are continuously monitored, and any changes/additions/deletions are immediately copied to your online storage and automagically propagated to any other machines running the software. The downside of course is cost, so if you go down this route you might also want to check out the alternatives - Sugarsync, Spideroak, Wuala are some examples that spring to mind.Well it will be about 100GB initially then of course it will be incremental. To be honest I think it still sounds the best option. The only other one is SyncToy really. I can't see that any others will be suitable.
The thing that concerns me most is the scheduling of robocopy for example. I was hoping the syncing will be checking all the time!
Thanks again![]()
If security is a serious issue, Spideroak or Wuala would be your best bet, as they perform client-side encryption and nothing ever leaves your own system unencrypted - Dropbox does encrypt your files, but the encryption is performed by them at the server end, and they could in theory gain access to your data, although it's their company policy not to do so (for whatever that's worth).
If you just want simple machine to machine syncing on your local network, check out FreeFileSync - it's faster, more reliable and has many more features than SyncToy, which has always left me considerably underwhelmed whenever I've used it. It also incorporates a realtime syncing component called (unsurprisingly) RealtimeSync which could be handy if you want your folders continuously monitored rather than periodic syncing on a schedule, although I've never used it personally so couldn't vouch for its ease of use or effectiveness.

edit: just noticed that FreeFileSync was in fact mentioned earlier in the thread - IMO it's currently the best of its type, although there are plenty of other options (free and commercial).
Last edited: