Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,167
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
Tony Blair didnt order military action in the name of Christianity. Big difference.
The point is it's not our job to accomodate their views, no matter how they came to have them.
Otherwise you're validating those views.
It seems by what you say about indoctrination that you don't think theses views are (always) sane, but you would still go out of your way to appease the people with these views.
Let's say a person is indoctrinated into believing in a flat Earth, and gets offended by scientific programs describing the world as spherical (ish).
Said person refuses to allow his children to sit in on lessons where they teach that the Earth is a sphere.
Would you a) ignore this person as they are getting offended over something that's plain nonsense, or b) validate this persons views by giving in to their request.
Islam is very much like that person. Getting offended to the point of murder for a drawing of a dead guy. To the point of murder, remember. And we're saying "well, it's our fault for offending them."
I don't like it.
Tony Blair didnt order military action in the name of Christianity. Big difference.
Sadly with this awakening I don't really see the world improving much.Understand your opinion completely but in the grand scheme of things our society has only recently awoken from the dark ages. You and I have been afforded the luxury of growing up in a society that has become more and more non secular. We are afforded the right to freedom of opinion and speech. But it's a double edged sword, The freedom to say something and the freedom to not hear it are entirely the same thing.
EXACTLY
Sadly with this awakening I don't really see the world improving much.
Since WW2, we are living in the only time in recorded history where there has never been a break in some form of war or conflict in the world.
The point is it's not our job to accomodate their views, no matter how they came to have them.
Otherwise you're validating those views.
It seems by what you say about indoctrination that you don't think theses views are (always) sane, but you would still go out of your way to appease the people with these views.
Let's say a person is indoctrinated into believing in a flat Earth, and gets offended by scientific programs describing the world as spherical (ish).
Said person refuses to allow his children to sit in on lessons where they teach that the Earth is a sphere.
Would you a) ignore this person as they are getting offended over something that's plain nonsense, or b) validate this persons views by giving in to their request.
Islam is very much like that person. Getting offended to the point of murder for a drawing of a dead guy. To the point of murder, remember. And we're saying "well, it's our fault for offending them."
I don't like it.
Since WW2, we are living in the only time in recorded history where there has never been a break in some form of war or conflict in the world.
Since WW2, we are living in the only time in recorded history where there has never been a break in some form of war or conflict in the world.
What utter nonsense.You think like that because you are unable and unwilling to solve the actual issue without causing offense. Those two options you have narrow-mindedly created are neither the solution. The answer is education. It is absolutely possible to educate someone on how planets work without retorting to calling someone's ignorant beliefs "plain nonsense" nor having any opinion on someone's predisposed ideas.
"Validating their views by giving in to their request" ??? Amazing.
I don't understand.
Would there have been this much fuss/issue/problem/offence if, and this is quite a big IF.. The Producers/TV Stations involved had just said 'So what..Deal with it'?

Tony Blair didnt order military action in the name of Christianity. Big difference.
So? So what?
I can decide to attach massive significance to my shoelaces if I want to. Doesn't mean everybody else should suddenly take care not to depict shoelaces in any cartoons, photos, drawings, etc.
The point is, they *choose* to get offended. *They* attach the significance to this book.
It is not our job in the west to bow before every group that decides to get overly attached to something.
Now pay your respects to my shoelaces, or I'll report you to the Ministry Of Being Offended. And they'll send the goons round.

What utter nonsense.
Education is about using facts, reason, logic, experience and understanding, none of which is compatible with, nor used by, religious doctrine.
How many times does it have to be proven that the great flood never took place, yet it is taught as historical fact in Islam? You cannot educate those who reject evidence and truth because it contradicts things they believe in.

What utter nonsense right back at you. You have no clue and you come across as a pretty sad individual.
So what if education is about using facts? How on earth is that a retort to absolutely anything I've said? All you are trying to do is jusify causing offense because you have no idea how to debate or educate someone.
You've completely missed the point here which is education is the only thing which can potentially fix anything. I know it's easy to label people's religious predispositions and cause offense but you know that these people have been indoctrinated with false ideas then you refuse to even give them the chance of a proper education without taking jibs at their condition? I swear it's isis who are supposed to be inhibiting education and have blown up many Muslim children in the process of inhibiting education.
Your attitude stinks tbh. You want to reserve your right to cause offense yet you want to deny people the chance of being educated. I'm assuming you think this way because you know nothing to teach anyone.
![]()
What weak people you both are in my opinion.
What utter nonsense right back at you. You have no clue and you come across as a pretty sad individual.
So what if education is about using facts? How on earth is that a retort to absolutely anything I've said? All you are trying to do is jusify causing offense because you have no idea how to debate or educate someone.
You've completely missed the point here which is education is the only thing which can potentially fix anything. I know it's easy to label people's religious predispositions and cause offense but you know that these people have been indoctrinated with false ideas then you refuse to even give them the chance of a proper education without taking jibs at their condition? I swear it's isis who are supposed to be inhibiting education and have blown up many Muslim children in the process of inhibiting education.
Your attitude is rather peculiar. You want to reserve your right to cause offense yet you want to deny people the chance of being educated. I'm assuming you think this way because you know nothing to teach anyone.
![]()
SO, fireman sam.....

