Aaahhh this is the one the bloke at the E3 PC Gaming Show was talking about. There I was telling my mate the price on this will be inflated and will probably come in around £700.
I don't know if I should laugh or cry.
TBH if spending £2000 I'd rather have a 1440p/144hz monitor and use the other £1700 left over for a really nice 55" OLED UHD TV
"Crikey. That's quite expensive." will have to suffice.
Actually, it isn't, for a first release. The first 4K monitors cost more when they came out. Dell's 8K monitor costs more. (Aside: has anyone noticed how much that has come down in price?)
Monitors are normally of much higher quality than TVs due to being viewed from a couple of feet away rather than across a room. This is why you have always been able to get 720p/1080p/4K TVs much cheaper than high end monitors but you wouldn't want to use them in place of a monitor.I am still struggling to work out how any 27" monitor is worth more than a 65" OLED TV......
That is not so strictly true these days. It used to be but TV tech has come a long long way in the last decade. I mean have you actually looked at an OLED TV close up? With the right source at 4K it looks incredible. Yes refresh rates are not that great but who has a GPU that can push over 100fps in true 4K with all the settings on Ultra? No one so in some ways, whats the dam point?Monitors are normally of much higher quality than TVs due to being viewed from a couple of feet away rather than across a room. This is why you have always been able to get 720p/1080p/4K TVs much cheaper than high end monitors but you wouldn't want to use them in place of a monitor.
That is not so strictly true these days. It used to be but TV tech has come a long long way in the last decade. I mean have you actually looked at an OLED TV close up? With the right source at 4K it looks incredible. Yes refresh rates are not that great but who has a GPU that can push over 100fps in true 4K with all the settings on Ultra? No one so in some ways, whats the dam point?
Dont get me wrong, i am fully in the "use a monitor for PC gaming and not a TV" camp but TVs are narrowing the gap. I have a 40" Philips Monitor that has a 4K res at 60Hz and its fantastic close up. I used to game at 120hz at a lower res but the trade off of Hz vs resolution is well worth it in my opinion.
Oh and by the way, that monitor cost me 600 quid...... You can see my basis for thinking that these monitors are massively over priced right?
In fact you can pick it up for well under 500 notes now.... https://www.**********/products/43-...-5ms-dpx2-hdmix2-vga-mhlx2-speakers-usb-30-x4
Are these monitors really 5 times this monitor?
Oof! Been looking forward to this for a while, but not at that price. I think I'll wait until the cards that can deliver 4K at high FPS get here. By that time, monitors with these specs will be priced at a level that's a little easier to swallow.