*sigh*
One day I'll look in a 'my first HDR image' thread and it will actually be a scene that contains a high dynamic range...
Ok some real constructive crit.
1. You're taking a photo of a shoe
2. Even if this were supposed to be a stock photo, the background is way too distracting to make the picture useable
3. HDR is a useful tool when used in the right circumstances, taking a HDR photo of a shoe in the middle of a table doesn't qualify.
4. I think xoloti worded this best: "It's a rubbish photo to start off with and HDR hasn't changed that."
5. As for applying the HDR technique it's been done quite nicely, there're no horrible halos or anything like that, it's brought out the creases quite nicely. But the original picture is not good, and as such just applying a technique to it is not going to change that fact.
And as for the andy worhole thing, it's not to my tastes. But it is perfect for a stock picture
Ok, ease off the insults a bit now.
To OP obviously hasn't created a masterpiece, but he was attempting a new technique and in that I think he's been quite successfull. yantorsen, you now need to go out and take a decent picture, and if the scene calls for it, use this technique. but don't rely on tecnique to make a good shot. Composition, content and exposure are all more important that technique or processing method.![]()
Name one with the name of the program used to create the effect in it.
Seriously, make your pictures smaller! That ones is 4.3Mb!
yantorsen - you NEED to reduce the file size of your images !!!
Do you have Photoshop, Paintshop or any image editor ?
If you do then save the image as a JPEG, 70% quality.
You have Photomatix![]()
Okay, you don't have any editing software yet you want to try HDR? Seriously, if you want to get into photography get Lightroom or PS. They will help you way more than photomatix will ever.
Im 17 and still at school.
Seriously, get PS and Lightroom..the combination you need.