The difference between 105 and ultegra is pretty small, nice to have but not essential.
Pfff - everyone knows rocking Dura Ace makes you more attractive to the opposite sex and at least 10% faster
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
The difference between 105 and ultegra is pretty small, nice to have but not essential.
Well I just tested out a Giant Defy 1 in large, a Giant Dey 2 in med/lar and a Cannondale CAAD8 but only the Sora.
Out of the 2 Giant's the med/lar was definitely the right size for, but overall there was just something about the ride on the Cannondale I preferred. But my head still says Giant for some reason. Can't decide![]()
To some degree, yes you are. You've already got things pretty much nailed down so now personally I'd go for the more expensive option (as above, 105 is a lot nicer than Sora) and start to worry about the frame size instead![]()
Pretty sure I tried out a 54 today, charts suggest a 56 would be more suitable. Any Cannondale riders with similar measurements to me 5'11 and 32 inside leg?
CycleSurgery extra 10% off for bikes using code BIKEEXTRA10.
puts the kona zing at £585
http://www.cyclesurgery.com/pws/ProductDetails.ice?ProductID=61647
meh, just blow your budget and get the new 2016 CAAD1225 podium points with this one will get you about £250 worth of kit making the bike more like £1k
http://www.pedalon.co.uk/acatalog/cannondale-caad12-105.html
The 54 might be slightly small for you. I'm 6" and 32/33 inside leg and currently riding a Cannondale Synapse in 56cm. It's almost perfect for me. The geometry is a bit different, Synapse default handlebar position is slightly up and back to make it more relaxed.