Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Sep 2016
- Posts
- 11,411
Appreciate the points there @lucid . I started down another rabbit hole "what if I got a 3.0 passive soundbar, then found some wireless atmos upfirers for the bookshelves.. and rears, and a sub". But then I would have spent £1500+ which is totally not worth it for this room (and huge point to make - my girlfriend is so paranoid about noise re. the neighbours we'll never watch anything at what I'd call a 'decent' volume anyway) plus the expected £1,000 on the TV and I just can't spend that right now. Unless you can find me a passive 3.0 soundbar with wireless rears, subwoofer, and atmos up-firers for under a grand all in?
Also, in complete laymans terms if I want to wall mount the TV and soundbar then it'd going to require trunking some cables against the wall from the receiver up to the soundbar and that's jusst a lot of effort for something that probably wouldn't pass the girlfriend test. lol
I'm pretty set on TV choice if I go this route. Probably Panasonic but maybe Sony. It's the soundbars I know nothing about. I think I need to start a new thread entitled "spec me an Atmos soundbar <£600 with a sub, and the ability to add wireless rear speakers at a later stage" ...
Not many passive soundbars around tbh there's these
Passive Soundbars | Monitor Audio
Monitor Audio's Soundbars provide the high definition sound you've been missing, and match the look of your TV with contemporary lifestyle design.
![www.monitoraudio.com](https://www.monitoraudio.com/en/product-ranges/soundbars/favicon.png)
You can then use any AVR and active subwoofer
tbh at that £600 I wouldn't even consider atmos as generally
"Less speakers, but higher quality speakers" is better than "lots of speakers, and all crappy quality" A quality 2.1 system will outclass a low end atmos system for sound quality. I can guarntee my home theatre in stereo mode or 2.1 mode will sound better than any soundbar.