Five dead and more than 40 injured including 12 kids as driver mows down Wisconsin Christmas parade

Liberals and Libertarians are different things.

Correct but they have corresponding views and definitions. For example;

Libertarian (noun)
a person who advocates civil liberty.

Liberal (noun)
a supporter of a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.
 
Libertarians would say people should not have the right to free healthcare.

You're going to have to show me where that's implied in the definition of libertarian. My understanding is they stand against direct interference from the state, utilising free healthcare is not such. That healthcare is not forced upon them, there are other options available.
 
I notice this trial isn't getting the same coverage in the UK as say Rittenhouse for example, I wonder why that is.. :rolleyes:

You know you libs people can not at any time say things against a person of colour for any reason.

On 10 pages and not many libs posting to say how bad he\it is.

Look how many posts you and the gang posted in the shooting thread. 100s
Here ...no many.

Because no one is arguing about this. If this had been some right wing nut most of you would be saying well he has a point, or it was self defence, look what BLM did, orange man bad, religion of peace, muslim ray guns. Stuff like that.

That is the reason those thread are so long because you lot are usually on the wrong side and have to argue about it.

You know most people know OJ is guilty right? There Ive said it.
 
Because no one is arguing about this. If this had been some right wing nut most of you would be saying well he has a point, or it was self defence, look what BLM did, orange man bad, religion of peace, muslim ray guns. Stuff like that.

That is the reason those thread are so long because you lot are usually on the wrong side and have to argue about it.

You know most people know OJ is guilty right? There Ive said it.
I see you are conflating this forum's user base with the main stream media, well done on those reading skills.

And if you to take this forum and want to argue about being on the 'wrong side', the only 'long' thread I've been involved in was the Rittenhouse one and strangely enough, I was on the right side. It was the posters such as yourself who were on the wrong side ;)
 
I see you are conflating this forum's user base with the main stream media, well done on those reading skills.

And if you to take this forum and want to argue about being on the 'wrong side', the only 'long' thread I've been involved in was the Rittenhouse one and strangely enough, I was on the right side. It was the posters such as yourself who were on the wrong side ;)

Just because someone gets away with something doesnt make it the right side.
 
The judge saw right right through him at the final stage.

He has got over 1,200 years to serve.


 
Last edited:
He's shown zero remorse (obviously someone with his views wouldn't) and for me it still feels like he's getting off lightly, yeah ok life in prison but he'll probably join a black power group and be quite comfortable.
 
The judge saw right right through him at the final stage.

He has got over 1,200 years to serve.

Disgusting to think he could be out in only 1,000 years with good behaviour.

This is how to sentence people:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63668818

"A court in Turkey has sentenced a televangelist, who surrounded himself with young women he referred to as his "kittens", to 8,658 years in prison.
...
He was originally given a jail sentence of 1,075 years but an appeal court ordered a retrial involving 215 defendants.
Ten of them were also given 8,658 years in prison by the court in Istanbul. Many of the other defendants were given shorter terms."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom