Folding@Home News 2nd - 9th February

For reference, you can extrapolate if you use your own stats as a frame of reference:

4P 6174 current PPD:

6901 - 303,118.67 PPD
6903 - 488,575.32 PPD
6904 - 476,341.85 PPD
8101 - 140,396.43 PPD

4P 6174 revised PPD:
6901 - 363,750.87 PPD
6903 - 488,575.32 PPD
6904 - 476,341.85 PPD
8101 - 322,916.07 PPD

6900/1 are going away, so they're irrelevant.
6903/4 unchanged - for now.
8101 roughly equal to 6901, 68% of 6904 and 66% of 6903

Right now my 4Ps get @475K because most assigns are 6903/4. If 8101 is released with no further changes, I'll get 33% LESS folding them.

And what happens when 6903/4 are converted to bigadv-16 projects?

If there are no further changes to 8101, and 6903/4 are brought in line with it, my 4P PPD drops 33%. Period.
 
Hi guys, i've just started folding and joined up on the forums (I have been a long time reader but never registered!).

At the moment I am just experimenting with the basic uniprocessor client on my desktop. But i have a spare Shuttle pc that i cobbled together recently and it's collecting dust at the moment. It has a Q6700 @ stock and an ATI 5670. Would i be better off going for a multicore client or a gpu2 client for it?

Cheers
 
Hi guys, i've just started folding and joined up on the forums (I have been a long time reader but never registered!).

At the moment I am just experimenting with the basic uniprocessor client on my desktop. But i have a spare Shuttle pc that i cobbled together recently and it's collecting dust at the moment. It has a Q6700 @ stock and an ATI 5670. Would i be better off going for a multicore client or a gpu2 client for it?

Cheers

I wouldn't bother with the GPU client, it doesn't do too well on ATI cards unfortunately and it eats a lot of CPU time too. I'd just fold SMP (multicore) on that PC, if it's overclockable at all then do so as it'll really help. At stock you'd be looking at around 3K PPD from it if I remember rightly.

Oh, and welcome to the team and forum!
 
Back
Top Bottom