For all the Cheryl Cole haters! Proof she CAN sing :)

well youd expect her to be able to sing since shes supposed to be a singer

theres lots better than her

and shes still a massively annoying scumbag who got lucky. shes just an even more famous version of that ''lotto lout'' guy. but with boobs
 
Last edited:
Some people talk about her like she's the next Princess Diana. Di was overrated but at least she made some useful contributions to the world, so what does that make Cole?
 
Poor Cheryl takes too much criticism for not being able to sing.

Well I beg of you to watch this!

BBC Children In Need at the Royal Albert Hall with Snow Patrol performing Set Fire to The Third Bar

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00p06bp/Children_in_Need_2009_Rocks_the_Royal_Albert_Hall/

Time = 1.09 / 2.00

and yes I love her that much that I had to make this thread :D

It's no whitney or Celine but it's still a very good voice :)

  1. Comparing Cheryl Cole's voice to Martha Wainwright's (the original person to sing the duet) is just plain ridiculous - you don't deserve ears if you think her voice is anywhere near as good as Martha's.
  2. Second of all, her voice was completely over powered by Gary's. That's why it didn't sound "too bad". At least Martha's voice can actually complement Gary's and still be heard.

It was almost as bad as Dizzee Rascal attempting to sing a long to Hey Jude, whilst waving his bloody hand up and down as if it was a ******* rap song.

Unfortunately, we now live in a world where majority of the British public like making completely talentless people with mediocre voices famous.
 
  1. Comparing Cheryl Cole's voice to Martha Wainwright's (the original person to sing the duet) is just plain ridiculous - you don't deserve ears if you think her voice is anywhere near as good as Martha's.
  2. Second of all, her voice was completely over powered by Gary's. That's why it didn't sound "too bad". At least Martha's voice can actually complement Gary's and still be heard.

Give me an example of where I compare Martha's voice to Cheryl's. Oh yea that's right, I don't, so stop talking tosh.

I'd say the sound levels were quite equal, not like it's difficult to hear Cheryl.

I never said her voice was outstanding, I simply said she can sing. Nothing more , nothing less.

Some people talk about her like she's the next Princess Diana.

Erm, do they?

Decidedly average and thats saying something...she wasnt terrible but neither was she any good either.

So she's gone from Utter rubbish as you claimed above to 'decidedly average'
 
Last edited:
she's done nothing that's impressed me so far. That's probably one of the easiest songs to sing being the female vocalist and she still managed to miss some of those notes. It wasnt that good at all.
 
Basically, he's your typical 20 year old.

Still has a bit of raging hormones left inside him from his teen years and as a result, gets an insta-boner over any airbrushed or make up clad bint he sees on TV.

Yes, she's attractive but compare her to what she looked like when she was auditioning for Pop idols the rivals.

When you have copious amounts of cash and time - anyone can make themselves look good.
 
Gustov said:
skippi90 said:
Her boobs.
This
Gustov said:
lol ^^

The thread was about her voice.
Nice one!

starskg0.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom