While high stress overclocking makes the problem show up faster, its still a fact some of the Foxconn LGA1156's pins are making poor contact with the cpu, and if the CPU is at full load it will be putting additional stress on the good contacts, and potentially overheating the poor contacts.
Foxconn will no doubt improve the socket, but the only way to tell if you have a good one, is install the chip, fit a heatsink (ideally without applying the compound, you just want the pressure of the heatsink on the cpu/socket/motherboard, and then remove it all.
Inspect the bottom of the chip, every pad should now be marked from the pins in the socket. If there are batches of pads with no insertion marks on them, the socket is defective.
Nobody knows the long term effect of a CPU with a large number of poor contacts, when I build a PC I want to know that the CPU will be fine several years down the line, I would not trust the current revision of foxconn LGA1156 socket, and if I received a board with one I would use the distance selling act to return it.
I suppose that Distance Selling act can still be called on if you do a contact test with cpu/motherboard and that you can still return the board if you can prove to yourself the socket is defective.
The more you overclock, or overvolt the faster the problem will show up, and potentially destroying both CPU and Motherboard, but there is absolutely no guarantee that the bad socket will stand the test of time even at stock or modestly overclocked configurations. Aandtech noted minor darkening on a i5/750 after a few thousand hours, well thats only 3 months or so constant use, so whos's to say what even stock chips will be like after 15 to 20,000 hours use.
For what its worth, I dislike the abuse of the Distance Selling Act (for example to return a CPU that works perfectly at stock but doesnt overclock high enough, or in the early days of LCD when defects were more common but within "spec" returning screens with 1 or 2 minor defects). But if a product is clearly unfit for its job, then either Consumer protection laws, or Distance Selling act are perfectly acceptable options.