Hmm perhaps. I concede that I'm not well versed in these issues as you may infer from my absence from previous threads debating the subject of Palestine. (Why am I getting involved now then, you may askShackley said:I would suggest that Bliar's rejection of the democratically elected Hamas, his support of US efforts to punish the Palestinian people for electing what was at the time a relatively effective and corruption free Hamas and his consistent unwavering support of the Israelis has contributed to a further collapse of law and order and an environment that has made life less safe for everyone, Alan Johnston included.
Since most Palestinians seem opposed to the people who kidnapped Alan Johnston who they describe as being "nothing more than gangsters," and not linked to anyone in Palestine, I hardly think that any change in policy would be seen as rewarding the kidnappers, perhaps exactly the opposite?
)I don't know. My initial reaction would be to think that any change in policy now would lose face for Britain. I don't care how foolish Blair looks but I do care how foolish my country looks.Are you (as a Devil's advocate) suggesting that having chosen an immoral, unjust and undemocratic stance, the British Government should stick to it simply so as not to suggest that they listen to people who quite rightly do not agree with them?
Incidentally is Brown likely to do anything different when he becomes PM soon? Will he be happy for the US to dictate British foreign policy in the way that Blair has been?



