****Fresh random image thread (with rule addition)Every post MUST contain an image!****
- Thread starter Gilly
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
PS skill
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
Another photo with everything in exactly the same place except the tiles?
http://www.reddit.com/r/picrequests/comments/rmzyr/request_could_you_remove_me_from_this_picture/
The fact that the guy is standing on some blue tiles which have become red in the second picture do point to the guy having been photoshopped out, since new tiles would have to be put in to replace him.
If they'd just gotten a source photo from the same angle with neither the guy or the dog, and shopped the dog in, the tiles would match.
Look at the top left of the photo though: in the "original" the bottom of the hedge is right against the edge of the image, but in the "edited" photo there's a gap between them. If anything it should be the other way around. At the very least that left hand image isn't the original, you wouldn't photoshop in a gap like that.
Lol, why am I tempted to do that and see what happens
It's very clearly from a slightly different perspective, loaded into photoshop and overlaid makes it even more obvious, it is merely a different photograph with the bloke having moved out of shot.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 15,707
- Location
- The land of milk & beans
You're using 2 different skewed/cropped images, so when overlayed they don't match.
If you grab the 2 original images they match. http://i.imgur.com/QEOnA.jpg http://i.imgur.com/fPqHQ.jpg
Animated version here.
I merely used the two posted, not my problem that they are clearly different, though why one is skewed is odd.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2007
- Posts
- 9,094
- Location
- Surrey
Yup almost certainly a PS.
(My matching up the images isn't perfect but you can see by the grey that it is the same image. The areas that aren't grey are the areas that have been changed.)
**Just saw the original images link. Cba uploading again.
(My matching up the images isn't perfect but you can see by the grey that it is the same image. The areas that aren't grey are the areas that have been changed.)
**Just saw the original images link. Cba uploading again.
Last edited:
Looking at the original pictures, I would guess the most likely scenario is that someone used a camera on a tripod to take two pictures, one with the man, one without. The dog was then photoshopped onto both.
M
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
Lol at those images causing so much confusion. It is photoshopped from 1 image. It's from a pic editing requests subreddit. If it helps clear it up i used the snipping tool with 2 chrome windows open because i couldn't be bothered loading up PS to put them in 1 image, hence them being slightly different sizes. If you look at the originals its obvious.
It's pretty obvious it's a photoshop. 
For those saying the guy just moved out of shot, surely the dog would move at least a tiny bit in the amount of time it takes for the guy to jump out of shot and another picture to be taken instantly after? There's no head/paw movement or anything. Unless it's a stuffed dog...
You people need your eyes testing.
For those saying the guy just moved out of shot, surely the dog would move at least a tiny bit in the amount of time it takes for the guy to jump out of shot and another picture to be taken instantly after? There's no head/paw movement or anything. Unless it's a stuffed dog... You people need your eyes testing.
- Status