****Fresh random image thread (with rule addition)Every post MUST contain an image!****

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
8 Jul 2009
Posts
3,105
Location
Folkestone
j5w4y8.jpg
 

Lum

Lum

Soldato
Joined
23 Nov 2008
Posts
3,283
Location
South Wales
Another photo with everything in exactly the same place except the tiles?

The fact that the guy is standing on some blue tiles which have become red in the second picture do point to the guy having been photoshopped out, since new tiles would have to be put in to replace him.

If they'd just gotten a source photo from the same angle with neither the guy or the dog, and shopped the dog in, the tiles would match.

POoMzl.jpg

u5cial.jpg
 

Art

Art

Associate
Joined
25 Jan 2009
Posts
2,034
The fact that the guy is standing on some blue tiles which have become red in the second picture do point to the guy having been photoshopped out, since new tiles would have to be put in to replace him.

Look at the top left of the photo though: in the "original" the bottom of the hedge is right against the edge of the image, but in the "edited" photo there's a gap between them. If anything it should be the other way around. At the very least that left hand image isn't the original, you wouldn't photoshop in a gap like that.

ajno84.jpg
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Dec 2006
Posts
10,056
Location
UK
Another photo with everything in exactly the same place except the tiles?

It's very clearly from a slightly different perspective, loaded into photoshop and overlaid makes it even more obvious, it is merely a different photograph with the bloke having moved out of shot.

photoshop.jpg
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Jan 2004
Posts
10,185
Soldato
Joined
11 May 2007
Posts
8,967
Location
Surrey
Yup almost certainly a PS.



(My matching up the images isn't perfect but you can see by the grey that it is the same image. The areas that aren't grey are the areas that have been changed.)

**Just saw the original images link. Cba uploading again.
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,320
Location
Vvardenfell
You're using 2 different skewed/cropped images, so when overlayed they don't match.

If you grab the 2 original images they match.



Looking at the original pictures, I would guess the most likely scenario is that someone used a camera on a tripod to take two pictures, one with the man, one without. The dog was then photoshopped onto both.



lab_inst_room.jpg



M
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2009
Posts
19,892
Location
Wales
Lol at those images causing so much confusion. It is photoshopped from 1 image. It's from a pic editing requests subreddit. If it helps clear it up i used the snipping tool with 2 chrome windows open because i couldn't be bothered loading up PS to put them in 1 image, hence them being slightly different sizes. If you look at the originals its obvious.

qFg3G.jpg
 
Caporegime
Joined
4 Jul 2004
Posts
30,700
It's pretty obvious it's a photoshop. :confused: For those saying the guy just moved out of shot, surely the dog would move at least a tiny bit in the amount of time it takes for the guy to jump out of shot and another picture to be taken instantly after? There's no head/paw movement or anything. Unless it's a stuffed dog... :p

You people need your eyes testing.

yyqic.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom