from this too this shock
- Thread starter mattheman
- Start date
Why do you way about 9 stone ringing wet!
If you weigh less than even a curvy lady can I suggest you do some exercise and beef up a bit
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,049
- Location
- Some where, out there
She can lose the weight she's put on fairly easily if she choses to.
How much harder is it for the people criticising her purely on the basis of her changed size to lose their ignorance?
How much harder is it for the people criticising her purely on the basis of her changed size to lose their ignorance?
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Ok, so she's put on weight in the second picture but I wouldn't call her fat.
Summary: I would
Summary: I would
She said it herself at the time when the movie came out she was eating next to nothing and was hitting the gym everyday to the point people were getting worried. She looked amazing at the time i grant you but that's not her natural state, she only did it for the film as she was extremely worried how she looked.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,936
- Location
- Manchester.
fair play, perhaps not hers but it is for many others.
I'm in a hurry, but I just have to log in and let off a salvo in this thread.
The second thread shows a beautiful, healthy confident young woman.
The first photo looks airbrushed, edited, and is of an underweight unhappy looking young woman. Look around the face, neck and arms. Seriously skinny. Nice legs though.
My real point though is that so much comment in this thread reflects the position rammed down our throats all the time by virtually every segment of the media that photo 1 is good and photo 2 is bad.
The power of the media had corrupted your minds people, to believe that a thin bony unhealthy young woman is desirable - and by accepting this attitude you are inadvertently pressuring other young women into damaging themselves to conform to your (well not really yours is it?) stereotype.
The second thread shows a beautiful, healthy confident young woman.
The first photo looks airbrushed, edited, and is of an underweight unhappy looking young woman. Look around the face, neck and arms. Seriously skinny. Nice legs though.
My real point though is that so much comment in this thread reflects the position rammed down our throats all the time by virtually every segment of the media that photo 1 is good and photo 2 is bad.
The power of the media had corrupted your minds people, to believe that a thin bony unhealthy young woman is desirable - and by accepting this attitude you are inadvertently pressuring other young women into damaging themselves to conform to your (well not really yours is it?) stereotype.
Deleted member 66701
Deleted member 66701
I'd not turn down either as I find both VERY attractive.
However, if they were twins and i met them in a pub (I wish) and they said I could take just one of them to bed (double wish) I go for the lass in the first pic (yes, I know they are the same person).
I just find the first pic more attractive - yes it may be the clothes but it's also the body to some extent.
I do have a thing for skinny chicks but my wife is "normal" (define normal) - not skinny, not fat and I lover her nonetheless for it, despite what my "preference" might be. Oh, and she's been the same since we first started dating, so you can't say she's got bigger over time.
However, if they were twins and i met them in a pub (I wish) and they said I could take just one of them to bed (double wish) I go for the lass in the first pic (yes, I know they are the same person).
I just find the first pic more attractive - yes it may be the clothes but it's also the body to some extent.
I do have a thing for skinny chicks but my wife is "normal" (define normal) - not skinny, not fat and I lover her nonetheless for it, despite what my "preference" might be. Oh, and she's been the same since we first started dating, so you can't say she's got bigger over time.
Last edited by a moderator: