Game of the year - Bioshock

of course it has replay value, you can try out different combinations of weapons, ammo, plasmids, genetonics.

What difference does that actually make to the game though, other than killing people in different ways? The game is essentially the same linear set of affairs whichever way go about it.

At least in FPSs like Dark Messiah your actions have significant consequenses on the story line as it progresses. All you get in Bioshock is some different dialogue and and an alternative ending video.
 
Last edited:
What difference does that actually make to the game though, other than killing people in different ways? The game is essentially the same linear set of affairs whichever way go about it.

At least in FPSs like Dark Messiah your actions have significant consequenses on the story line as it progresses. All you get in Bioshock is some different dialogue and and an alternative ending video.

Well surely getting to the same place in a different way is replay value? I mean Halo 3 is fairly linear but that doesn't mean it doesn't have replay value.
 
The cut off point for these awards seem to be about september. No way was oblivion a better game last year than either gears of war or Rainbow 6 which where released later in the year.

The same with biopap. Its a fair enough once through game but wouldn't make my top 5. No one cared about it a month after release.

In my opinion Oblivion was better than both of those two, as I played it way more than I played the other two, and got more enjoyment out of it.

As for Bioshock, it's right up there for GOTY as far as I'm concerned. Far better than Halo3 (boring), and on par with COD4 and Mass Effect (though I'm not finished with either, so both could prove to be better in the end).
 
Well surely getting to the same place in a different way is replay value? I mean Halo 3 is fairly linear but that doesn't mean it doesn't have replay value.

All that's different is your killing people differently, essentially your still getting to the same place in the same way!

Halo 3 doesn't have much, if any, replay value imho.
 
All that's different is your killing people differently, essentially your still getting to the same place in the same way!

Halo 3 doesn't have much, if any, replay value imho.

but its a shooter! the 'way' is killing people! This isn't an RPG like KOTOR where you can play a different role each time, its an FPS where the fun is had from killing things in different ways surely?
 
Definitely deserving of it. The only other game with a story as strong in this years game cycle was The Darkness and that never stood a chance against the big budget Bioshock.

Bioshock was a massive project and in terms of design and realisation of a concept around an Art Deco theme it's utterly brilliant. I felt I lived in the world, a fully believable, splicer ridden world with 3 different stories going on. Awesome gaming.
 
As for Bioshock, it's right up there for GOTY as far as I'm concerned. Far better than Halo3 (boring), and on par with COD4 and Mass Effect (though I'm not finished with either, so both could prove to be better in the end).

Bioshock isn't in the same annual game cycle as Mass Effect of CoD4 I don't believe, so it's possible those 2 would be competing next year (along with Mario Galaxy), so it would seem to me, that for you (like me) it was pretty much a one horse race in the shape of Bioshock.
 
but its a shooter! the 'way' is killing people! This isn't an RPG like KOTOR where you can play a different role each time, its an FPS where the fun is had from killing things in different ways surely?

Pfff there have been loads of FPSs with dynamic story lines. This isn't one of them.

If I just wanted a fun shooter I'd play UT.
 
Does seem to be a bit of a Marmite game this.

A mate of mine, and I both got our copies around the same time.

It was me that talked him into getting it, from what I'd seen and read on the net, sounded brilliant.

I installed it, I was wowed by it, I really think the styling of it is simply superb. But, after getting so far, and having to run all the way back somewhere to get a key or something, to find that I can't get the key, as something else is wrong, and having to backtrack further to do something, to unlock a door, to get a key, to unlock another door... by the time I'd done this, and gone to and fro the same locations where I'd been before, I simply quit, uninstalled it, and hated it, and thought what a shame.. such great promise, thrown away on boring objectives.

On the other hand, my mate who wasn't convinced at first, is still going, and loving it.

It really seems to be a Marmite game. I did feel somehow let down by it though. I know, it's only a bloody video game, how can you feel let down by it. I think it's just because initially, it came across as being so damn good, the powers you have were fun, and again, the style, and the world just sucked me in... I was frustrated that something that looked so good, could be so bad, Like they spent all their time on the graphics, and indeed the gameplay itself, but quickly threw together the actual objectives at the end.

I dunno, I'm not wishing to argue with anybody, I know many people love it, and good for them, I wish I did, but I just got really fed up with it. I'm not calling it a crap game, just calling it not my cup of tea. It does amaze me though, that so many people think it's so good, and so many think the exact opposite. As I said at the beginning, a real Marmite game. Hell, PC Zone gave it 96%. From them, that's one hell of a score!

V1N.

EDIT: Sorry,I was doing a few things at once, whilst typing this, and now I come to read it back, I realise how many times I used the name Marmite! Maybe I should get paid for advertising?
 
Back
Top Bottom