(gamegpu) Battlefield 1 Benchmarks

Seanspeed · 14 Oct 2016 at 19:04

Lokken86 said:
The Fury isn't beating the 1070 by anything eye raising but the 480 is a good bit ahead of the 1060 tbh.

I suppose if you compare 1060 DX11 with 480 DX12, you'd be right.

nashathedog · 14 Oct 2016 at 19:15

Seanspeed said:
Today I'm learning that something of a 5% performance gap or so is 'absolutely destroying' in comparison.

I'd call that a laughable exaggeration, but ok.

As a rule the 1070 should have a respectable lead over the Fury X but here it sits a good 10 frames behind in 1440p so yes let us have our moment in the sun sheesh!

JediFragger · 14 Oct 2016 at 22:32

nashathedog said:
As a rule the 1070 should have a respectable lead over the Fury X but here it sits a good 10 frames behind in 1440p so yes let us have our moment in the sun sheesh!

Yup, the Fury's are gonna be v good DX12 cards methinks

Lokken86 · 14 Oct 2016 at 22:57

Seanspeed said:
I suppose if you compare 1060 DX11 with 480 DX12, you'd be right.

Naturally id run whichever mode performs best since they both look the same to me.

TheMorningStar · 14 Oct 2016 at 23:20

Do we have many/any games with full mGPU support in DX12 as yet? I know ashes was supporting 2 GFX cards, including integrated but I haven't been following closely.

It would be nice if they upgraded SW:BF to DX12 if they also do mGPU

humbug · 15 Oct 2016 at 03:45

motiv said:
Did you notice the 1060 seemed to be in the middle of London in the 1890s. Are they using fog to bump fps?

This is a good point, the 1060 image looks completely different.

Brazo · 15 Oct 2016 at 09:24

Given the 1060 beats the 480 in other battlefront/field games and the same engine is in use im going to wait on further testing am not convinced by this.

Jono8 · 15 Oct 2016 at 11:36

So does DX12 in this actually add anything (ie make the game look better) or does it just hobble performance on Nvidia cards like a lot of dx12 games?

TheRealDeal · 15 Oct 2016 at 11:45

Brazo said:
Given the 1060 beats the 480 in other battlefront/field games and the same engine is in use im going to wait on further testing am not convinced by this.

Battlefront is a little different. Amd put on a decent show in this game. Although the Rx480 looks out of place. Maybe they are using the throttle edition.

http://m.imgur.com/bqlr1Vn?r

Brazo · 15 Oct 2016 at 13:27

TheRealDeal said:
Battlefront is a little different. Amd put on a decent show in this game. Although the Rx480 looks out of place. Maybe they are using the throttle edition.

http://m.imgur.com/bqlr1Vn?r

No that's about right. If you peg the 1060 at 980 performance then as with the other bf games there's a 15% advantage to the 1060.

TheRealDeal · 15 Oct 2016 at 13:33

Brazo said:
No that's about right. If you peg the 1060 at 980 performance then as with the other bf games there's a 15% advantage to the 1060.

The 390x is faster than the gtx980 which is also matched by the 390. I think AMD have some driver work to do as the RX480 should be matching the 390. The gtx980 is actually faster than the 1060 in this game.

~>Dg<~ · 15 Oct 2016 at 15:15

Kaapstad said:
Another game without mGPU support in DX12.

DX12 is shaping up to be the most useless API ever.

Bring back Mantle pleased......

said it from the off its a DX10 all over again.couple of games with no real difference.salesmen x i call it.

shankly1985 · 15 Oct 2016 at 16:06

They is a difference though :rolleyes:

Getting sick and tired of saying this on here now!! And you all call yourselves gamers...

Even with the same frame rate DX12 is night and day vs DX11 because of the lower frame latency. Games feel much smoother...

Am yet to play a game that doesn't show this and even enough proof out there to back me up.

Playing Deus Ex mankind divided atm and DX12 vs DX11 is night and day....

I guess it's because mix of higher min and them better frame latency that makes this happen..

You guys need to stop looking at xx fps vs xx fps they is far more to it than that.

Nexus18 · 15 Oct 2016 at 16:09

^^

But yes dx 12, vulkan, mantle are superb, give me higher min fps and lower frame latency over a higher max FPS any day of the week.

Kaapstad · 15 Oct 2016 at 16:17

When devs start taking mGPU seriously in DX12 it may be worth using but until then it is next to useless @2160p.

mGPU DX11 setups are far better for 2160p.

shankly1985 · 15 Oct 2016 at 16:19

Kaapstad said:
When devs start taking mGPU seriously in DX12 it may be worth using but until then it is next to useless @2160p.

mGPU DX11 setups are far better for 2160p.

See you have a fair point

Greebo · 15 Oct 2016 at 16:43

Nexus18 said:
^^

But yes dx 12, vulkan, mantle are superb, give me higher min fps and lower frame latency over a higher max FPS any day of the week.

Agreed. Look at ROTTR. min frames double over dx11 but only a 3% hit on max framerates

Erik13 · 15 Oct 2016 at 17:53

Lol nvidias vulkan/dx12 support stinks

Jono8 · 15 Oct 2016 at 18:00

I can understand Nvidia not gaining anything or gaining very little, but what is the reason for actually losing a decent chunk of performance?

Dave2150 · 15 Oct 2016 at 18:19

JediFragger said:
Yup, the Fury's are gonna be v good DX12 cards methinks

Pascal is still far superior to Fiji. Even in DX12.

Plus consider that it will be years before the majority of games are DX12. Until then DX11 is far more important.