Why did Nigel Farage have to set up his own independent Journalism on youtube, where he exposed illegal channel crossing months before the BBC decided to follow suit on the topic?
The UK is somewhat unique in this, yes a lot of 'newspapers' are right leaning, but most people dismiss those as 'Daily Fail' and such. Why did Nigel Farage have to set up his own independent Journalism on youtube, where he exposed illegal channel crossing months before the BBC decided to follow suit on the topic? How long did all of the media and the law ignore ethnic rape gangs and such because it was considered racist to even think that was going on?
How many things continue to be silenced as 'hate speech', just for pointing out things that are maybe slightly uncomfortable to hear? People keep asking me for examples and I would love to give more, but we aren't allowed to go off topic!
A news channel like this NEEDED TO HAPPEN because all other non independent Journalism in the UK is being suppressed by calling every tiny thing hate speech. People earlier saying everything is a fantasy which is only because the media isn't covering it in the first place, and we can't even talk about it here.
But but but the BBC are all horrible lefties who never talked about these issues until the ever so loveable decent chappy Farage pointed it out I know this to be true as Nige said it himself and he never lies not like those life long establishment politicians who this rogue outsider man of the people bought to there knees!You are just so wrong
BBC articles on migrants crossing the channel:
31st August 2019 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-49535690
4th November 2019 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-50255360
20th January 2020 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50813246
Also 20th January 2020 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-51152601
April 7th 2020 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-52207869
And an entire Calais Migrant Crisis topic: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c008ql151wrt/calais-migrant-crisis
Farage first Youtube video about this - 28th April 2020
Laura Kuenssberg does not deserve the same assessment however, she's in a league of her own when it comes to bias.
The icing on the cake had to be her recent article suggesting there wasn't any real hard evidence of Johnson lying (whilst that video of several demonstrable lies was doing the rounds). Access and money wins the day.I gave her the benefit of the doubt at first, but when it turned out she had Cummings on speed dial and gave an easy ride to Boris, in the sit down interview she did, it was fairly obvious.
The icing on the cake had to be her recent article suggesting there wasn't any real hard evidence of Johnson lying (whilst that video of several demonstrable lies was doing the rounds). Access and money wins the day.
But obviously she has a massive left wing bias as she is broadcasting on and employed by the massively left wing biased mainstream media corporation that is the BBC? I’m not sold on her being ridiculously bias I just find her too lightweight she never really seems to push a point home or ask the right question no matter who she is interviewing.Agreed. She is nothing more than just a Governments spokesperson nowadays putting out whatever message they tell her to.
You are just so wrong
BBC articles on migrants crossing the channel:
Apologies then, the issue here then was that nothing was done about it for almost 2 years until Farage started reporting on it.
And even before then people would have still called it a conspiracy theory / fantasy.
Nothing is being done about it now. In fact the problem has gotten far worse since Farage reported on it.
You are just so wrong
BBC articles on migrants crossing the channel:
28th December 2018 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46705128
31st August 2019 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-49535690
4th November 2019 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-50255360
20th January 2020 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50813246
Also 20th January 2020 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-51152601
April 7th 2020 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-52207869
And an entire Calais Migrant Crisis topic: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c008ql151wrt/calais-migrant-crisis
Farage first Youtube video about this - 28th April 2020
On that scale GB News will thrive given the line up of presenters!This highlights perfectly how some people only take any notice of anything once a loudmouth snake oil salesman type person starts talking about it in language that is designed to rile people up.
So someone proves you origional point was made up hyperbole and you follow that up with more made up hyperbole? No government has ever done anything significant about illegal immigration into this country before or after Farage and nobody was painting it as a conspiracy theory/fantasy the BBC were just reporting sensible balanced coverage of the issue not shouty sensationalist nonsense. I look forward to seeing some sensible balanced reporting on the subject from GB News but I certainly won't hold my breath!Apologies then, the issue here then was that nothing was done about it for almost 2 years until Farage started reporting on it.
And even before then people would have still called it a conspiracy theory / fantasy.
So someone proves you origional point was made up hyperbole and you follow that up with more made up hyperbole? No government has ever done anything significant about illegal immigration into this country before or after Farage and nobody was painting it as a conspiracy theory/fantasy the BBC were just reporting sensible balanced coverage of the issue not shouty sensationalist nonsense. I look forward to seeing some sensible balanced reporting on the subject from GB News but I certainly won't hold my breath!
They do want to advertise but it's precisely because of cancel culture that they're now pulling advertising, companies are just as scared of being cancelled as people are which is why they too play along with the leftist/woke agenda.
Cancel culture is a kind word for it anyway, it's ultimately just censorship. Whether it's blocking funding, blocking services, shutting down speakers at universities, social media banning, suspending, shadow banning, de-monetising etc. It's all just aimed at blocking and suppressing voices they don't want the masses to hear.
If their ideology is so good they wouldn't need to shut down debate and competition.
Is it not just that the majority find these things repugnant, and brands follow the cues given to them by the majority of their customers?
Are some people unable to accept that their views are not shared by the majority?