Spie said:
Due to the declining standards in GD we are considering closing it for a while.
If that's what it takes, that's what it takes. Personally, I think it would be a shame, but .... well, maybe this post of yours, coming from you as a shot across the bows will work. I wouldn't hold my breath, though.
Spie said:
Bickering, insults, rule-breaking - the list goes on. It's better that you maintain standards here rather than having them imposed on you. It's in your hands ....
Is that not an argument for a bit less tolerance from the mods?
If there's rule-breaking, suspend the offenders. If people bicker, suspend both parties. If there's insults, suspend the insulter.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the mods don't do their jobs. Far from it. They're pretty much on the ball. The problem, as I see it, is that whether the perception is accurate or not, the perception is that the rules in GD are a bit slacker than they are elsewhere. Maybe that perception needs to be changed?
How about two basic classes of member - normal, and normal
except GD access is denied? Or maybe that latter class can GD read but not post in it? Then, for minor GD infractions a member can be shifted to that "minus GD" class instead of suspended. Or is that not practical, or too much work?
What I guess I'm trying to say is that if we have rules, enforce them. If we don't, make the rules we need, then enforce them. As long as people understand what's permitted and what isn't, they can't moan if they get punsihed for breaking them ... or rather they can (and will) moan, but it won't be justified.
And as for the point that's been made in this thread about spam threads in GD ..... what is spam?
There's a fairly high percentage of stuff in GD that I regard as unadulterated garbage. But as they are often among the most active threads, it's pretty clear that my definition of spam doesn't agree with lots of other people's definition. So ..... how do we define spam? Or,
who defines it?
I just ignore thread titles that suggest the content isn't going to interest me, and just don't bother reading it.
What I'd
really like is a thread ignore list. I'd like to be able to mark a thread as 'spam', so it didn't even show up as a thread in GD
to me. But I can understand why that probably isn't practical on a busy forum. I can dream, though.
