Permabanned
Do you know that? / are a lawyer? / or are you guessing?If your post gets quoted by someone else that becomes their right to freedom of expression and you dont have the right for it to be deleted.
Do you know that? / are a lawyer? / or are you guessing?If your post gets quoted by someone else that becomes their right to freedom of expression and you dont have the right for it to be deleted.
Do you know that? / are a lawyer? / or are you guessing?
When does the right to erasure not apply?
The right to erasure does not apply if processing is necessary for one of the following reasons:
- to exercise the right of freedom of expression and information;
I wouldn't have thought someone else's freedom of expression (expressing my personal information)
I don't think so. I'm the user of the system, OCUK is the controller and processor.If you make a post containing your own personal information, would that not make you the data controller?
You would be the one with control over what data gets posted and where it is posted.
I don't think so. I'm the user of the system, OCUK is the controller and processor.
I dont think that's correct?
If you've given a company permission to email you then they are legitimately allowed to email you under the current rules. The rules around you giving permission are being tightened so after 25th May, they wont have the correct permission to email you.
They are allowed to contact you before that date (if you've previously given permission) and ask your permission to continue contacting you under the new rules.
Because they might not have sufficient proof of that consent. We had a number of consents that were lacking a date and method of acquisition, and from the 25th that isn't good enough. Thankfully only 10% of our database is at risk.What I'm referring to is that if they do not have existing consent to send marketing emails, they can't send you an email to ask if they can send marketing materials. This is what we were advised by our legal firm. Why they'd ask you for your consent if they already have it is beyond me. This is the kind of thing I'm referring to here
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/28/ico_fines_flybe_honda/
Then they're free to do that surely? The only thing that would prevent that, as said earlier, is if someone has quoted you but i'm not convinced these regs place an obligation on OcUK as a company to be responsible for clearing up after you in the public domain, if you've said things publicly and other people have quoted it, I would have thought that's effectively your problem to overcome.Place voluntarily in the first instance, but what if they then want to remove them from that public place?
Well, as I said to billysielu earlier, there's a very easy way to test that theory in a week's timeWell, it’s not practical for a user to delete tens of thousands of posts. It’s incredibly easy for the mods to delete all of my posts (perhaps harder to remove instances where people have quoted me). The easiest and safest thing for them to do would be to delete all my posts if I ask them to... unless they want to take a big gamble or get expensive legal advice.
What I'm referring to is that if they do not have existing consent to send marketing emails, they can't send you an email to ask if they can send marketing materials. This is what we were advised by our legal firm. Why they'd ask you for your consent if they already have it is beyond me. This is the kind of thing I'm referring to here
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/28/ico_fines_flybe_honda/
I work for a school and they're taking the new legislation as though it's not serious. Apparently if we met the old data protection legislation we're likely to meet GDPR... Only just been brought to our attention even though I highlighted it over 2 months ago.
Get yes that's true. The vast majority of our database is corporate email addresses so mercifully we haven't had to worry about it too much, but one lady I spoke to see theirs go from 11k to 600 after a permission pass. Brutal!Because they might not have sufficient proof of that consent. We had a number of consents that were lacking a date and method of acquisition, and from the 25th that isn't good enough. Thankfully only 10% of our database is at risk.