GDPR violations related to ESA data leak

I just don't understand why someone would rather watch a 12 minute opinion piece on Youtube reacting to the news, when they can read the actual story themselves in minutes.
 
so are the folks who have publicized information about the lists existence (prior to its removal) guilty of any criminal activity themselves ?
was it marked proprietary ?, but is this like handling stolen goods, or equally like people who had re-posted videos of NZ shooting incident.

the guy who 'wrote' the VB article JEFF GRUBB - lol
 
Holy **** you're triggered. Instead of pushing for a more sensible quality level of discussion you'd rather push it down into the gutter with these OUTRAGED youtubers.

Not triggered just gets tiresome hearing records on repeat whinging about the messengers instead of the actual message :)
 
Jim Sterling did a video on this the other day and I must say he wasn't best pleased. Don't think his details were on but suppose he knows a lot of the people who are.
 
Not triggered just gets tiresome hearing records on repeat whinging about the messengers instead of the actual message :)

And yet here you are whinging about our whinging.


Here’s an idea, if you don’t like people whinging about your stuff on a public forum then maybe don’t post it on a public forum? Eh? Eh?

I know. Logics is hard.
 
And yet here you are whinging about our whinging.


Here’s an idea, if you don’t like people whinging about your stuff on a public forum then maybe don’t post it on a public forum? Eh? Eh?

I know. Logics is hard.
Can you get someone to repeat those three paragraphs in a 12 minute YouTube video for me?
 
And yet here you are whinging about our whinging.

Not my fault you clearly lack the aptitude to hold an attention span longer than a single sentence before you feel outraged enough to spout your utter frothy drivel as evidenced by you not even reading the OP to see a link was included, which I included specifically for the frothers like yourself who get triggered at every youtuber

If you don't like youtubers, don't watch the ******* vid and read the link instead BEFORE you begin frothing up with rage because a person more interesting, liked and successful than yourself has made a commentary video on the internet

Yes I get it, logic is hard :rolleyes:
 
All of my gaming podcasts are talking about this. I think some presenters have been contacted personally by randomers who didn't agree with their opinions about certain games.

And God help those of them who are female!
 
Not my fault you clearly lack the aptitude to hold an attention span

longer than a single sentence before you feel outraged enough to spout your utter frothy drivel as evidenced by you not even reading the OP to see a link was included, which I included specifically for the frothers like yourself who get triggered at every youtuber

If you don't like youtubers, don't watch the ******* vid and read the link instead BEFORE you begin frothing up with rage because a person more interesting, liked and successful than yourself has made a commentary video on the internet

Yes I get it, logic is hard :rolleyes:


You're cute when you're angry, quite the turn on :D


Anyway, here we go:

Your "aptitude" terminology is a bit rich when you use terms like "hold an attention span" - how the hell do you hold an attention span? You can have an attention span, or lack an attention span, but hold one? Hmmmmmm.

As for being triggered, I'd like to proclaim my innocence your honour! I did not have sexual intercourse with that woman!

If this is "triggered" then you need to go back to the school of what-is-triggering. Or a mirror, whatevs:

"LegacykillaHD"

ALT+F4

Search elsewhere. That dude's incessant non stop waaaaaaaaa in every single one of his videos is worse than nails on a chalkboard to me.

Oh, and maybe if you spent a bit more time making your posts a bit more readable, I'd be more inclined to read them. Sadly you and a few others are, in my case at least, instantly put in a category. I'll refrain from telling you the name of the category, I don't want you exploding in a massive ball of random-man-on-the-internet-fuelled rage, but I will tell you that it means that by default I skim over your posts. Maybe I'll miss something worth reading but I'm yet to be proven wrong, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Oh and I thoroughly enjoy Youtubers, there are many good ones out there, Angry Joe being rather amusing and not whining like a little bitch because someone tweeted that EA have painted their postbox so they're selling the building and murdering the devs and all their kittens. Another interesting one, oddly enough, is Mack, who does the Worth A Buy series, which again is interesting without all the clickbait rubbish. In fact, I highly encourage you to watch the first 20 seconds of this video, as he's clearly on the same page as myself and various posters in this thread:



And just to put your thoughts in to writing, to emphasize how much you mean to me:

Diddums you goat plowing donkey sucking retarded windowlicking moron!

Yes. All of that. Woooooo.
 
Jim Sterling did a video on this the other day and I must say he wasn't best pleased. Don't think his details were on but suppose he knows a lot of the people who are.

I don't think he was on the list. The only name I recognised on there was Jesse Cox. Most of the names are from the games media. I don't really know why ESA as to hold peoples physical addresses when everything could be done through email.
 
Back
Top Bottom