• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GeForce 750Ti – Runs Battlefield 4 Better Than PS4 & Titanfall Better Than Xbox One

The AMD equivalent of the card Humbug linked to:

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-339-SP&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1982
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-338-SP&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1982

The £140 one comes with BF4 and the card is quiet AFAIK. There is even a passive one:

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-170-PC&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1982

Either the GTX660 or R9 270 would be a decent upgrade over the GTX560TI and even drop the power requirements a bit.

The biggest improvement will be at idle - AMD also has something called ZeroCore which switches off the graphics card when the display is not in use for long periods.
 
Gregster said:
Easy as that hey! :)
Click to expand...

The 270X cut down 8970m Aside

They also have a cut down 40 Watt 512 SP 7750 embedded in their APU's, if they do as Nvidida did and remove half the texture units from Desktop SKU's, like the 896 SP 7790, i don't see why they couldn't get it down to 60 Watts.

An R7 260 "Lite edition" perhaps?
 
Last edited:
lettuce said:
Is this card worth upgrading from my 560Ti that i have in my HTPC??
Click to expand...

For comparison the 750ti trades blows with the GTX 570 in performance while using much less power.

If your looking for a low power HTPC card that run cool and quiet the 750Ti would be ideal, you could find other cards for a lil more money that might have more performance but also more power consumption / heat. So it's a trade off.

I've seen some GTX 750Ti's for under £110. For that price and for how little power it uses it's a nice lil card tbh. You could wait it out a bit longer and upgrade to a 20nm card rumored for Q4 2014. That would likely offer even more performance per watt.
 
WOW so often i come on here and after two pages of reading i have lost the will to live

Have you heard the say each to there own?

Whilst this card is not for me, its a step in the right direction, its just not a deal breaker for me, but i like it none the less, every little helps so why knock it.
 
TAZOO7 said:
WOW so often i come on here and after two pages of reading i have lost the will to live

Have you heard the say each to there own?

Whilst this card is not for me, its a step in the right direction, its just not a deal breaker for me, but i like it none the less, every little helps so why knock it.
Click to expand...
Design wise yes, pricing wise...no. Because of the price, it is a step in the wrong direction for pricing approach. There should be in no way that a new gen card that's same price as the previous gen card launched at the same price bracket (GTX650Ti Boost 2GB) be slower, regardless how little power it consume.
 
Last edited:
Impressive it trades blows with a 570 using that power. You could build a little 500w Maxwell EVGA hadron and put in a 4670k with 8GB 2400mhz and overclock them four cores past 4ghz and have a cracker of a little system.


That would play BF4 with some settings on Ultra and the rest on low with 60fps and cost £700 ish? Ive seen PCWorld junk boxes at £700 that could just about run DOTA and have no real upgrade path and crap generic psu. With that build you will be ready for the big Maxwells and have a 500w Gold unit to power one.
 
Last edited:
Marine-RX179 said:
Design wise yes, pricing wise...no. Because of the price, it is a step in the wrong direction for pricing approach. There should be in no way that a new gen card that's same price as the previous gen card launched at the same price bracket (GTX650Ti Boost 2GB) be slower, regardless how little power it consume.
Click to expand...

Remember the GTX 750ti it still at launch price (£110) The GTX 650 Ti Boost launched at (£145+). The launch price for the 750Ti is pretty fair considering what it can do in it's low power envelope, it's perfect for low power gaming setups / HTPC's..

High end gamers just need to be a bit more patient, Maxwell is looking very promising so far, soon as 20nm is a go. It'll get a lot more interesting..

Rofflay said:
Impressive it trades blows with a 570 using that power. You could build a little 500w Maxwell EVGA hadron and put in a 4670k with 8GB 2400mhz and overclock them four cores past 4ghz and have a cracker of a little system.


That would play BF4 with some settings on Ultra and the rest on low with 60fps and cost £700 ish? Ive seen PCWorld junk boxes at £700 that could just about run DOTA and have no real upgrade path and crap generic psu. With that build you will be ready for the big Maxwells and have a 500w Gold unit to power one.
Click to expand...

Yeah great for a good budget system. also a nice easy drop in upgrade for those who do have pre-built systems with lower power PSU's. You could throw one in a generic PCWorld build and be good to go without any additional power supply pins, just straight from the PCI slot..
 
Last edited:
Rofflay said:
Impressive it trades blows with a 570 using that power. You could build a little 500w Maxwell EVGA hadron and put in a 4670k with 8GB 2400mhz and overclock them four cores past 4ghz and have a cracker of a little system.


That would play BF4 with some settings on Ultra and the rest on low with 60fps and cost £700 ish? Ive seen PCWorld junk boxes at £700 that could just about run DOTA and have no real upgrade path and crap generic psu. With that build you will be ready for the big Maxwells and have a 500w Gold unit to power one.
Click to expand...

500w is a huge PSU and would be ample for pretty much any card :p
I'm using a SF 500w passive, used it with my 780, overclocked etc. It wouldn't even make that sweat.
 
Why isn't anyone using the "Drivers are not mature yet" -argument for the 750Ti? It might be better in the future. For AMD cards people forecasted over 20% improvements.
 
Tonester0011 said:
500w is a huge PSU and would be ample for pretty much any card :p
I'm using a SF 500w passive, used it with my 780, overclocked etc. It wouldn't even make that sweat.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The high end Shuttle SFF PSUs are 500W and can run six Core i7 CPUs and highish end graphics cards. The earlier ones used 400W and 500W SFF group regulated PSUs and I still could run overclocked 8800GTS 512MB and HD5850 1GB cards fine.

Valve uses the Silverstone Strider ST45SF-G 450W in its high end Steam Box with a Core i7 4770 and a Geforce Titan.

Vuv9hvp.jpg.png


Its a group regulated design too.

I like how some people on purpose ignore the fact.

They need to hype up the power requirements of all other cards. My Xeon E3 1220 and GTX660 consumes around 150W to 200W at the wall when gaming for example. But they HATE me mentioning me this and get very annoyed.
 
Last edited:
I am going to repeat the gaming charts for the 3rd time. Some hate me doing it since they wish they could be ignored,so they can push the GTX750TI repeatedly. Its like they must be getting some commission to push a slower product.

The worst thing all of them are having Core i7 CPUs with high end graphics cards with high end PSUs.

Plus for BF4,the AMD cards get Mantle upgrades too.

So for budget cards which will run BF4,AMD makes more sense.

Mantle reduces CPU overhead on lower end CPUs.

For people with limited budgets the AMD cards will run probably BF4 better due to their lower CPU requirements in that game,especially during MP games,once Mantle exits BETA.

Most people are running lower end CPUs too.

OFC,that will be ignored too.

The GTX750TI hype needs to be countered here,before they give bad advice on these forums to people to buy £110 to £130 GTX750TI cards,when superior GTX660 and R9 270 cards are around the same price.

Loads of the normal forum going folk here are unaware of how much the GTX660 and R9 270 cost now.

Things might change in the future,but until then GTX750TI is still not there.

The GTX660 and R9 270 are better cards at the current time and current prices.

Hype does not make your games run better.
 
Last edited:
xGZEbD5.png
FKsZWd4.png

ORXDzVV.png
f48LJvU.png

4E9LQiy.png
Dzjh5Xs.jpg

EsDMOJX.jpg
8OFtDtn.jpg

Y3ENCp8.jpg
QqY9hPC.jpg

bSybNT6.jpg
CdT1gjN.jpg


When running games,most reviews are pegging the GTX660 and R9 270 systems at under 200W at the wall.

This shows you despite,the GTX750TI technically being more efficient,how little the GTX660 and R9 270 consume in absolute values. But of course these are ignored now.

These are now power hogs even though they are consistently faster. It is funny,since cards with a single PCI-E power connector in the past the like the 9800GT and HD6850 have proven themselves to run fine off even lower end PSUs,and they are ancient.

Any decent enough PSU over 300W would work fine.

However,the people with belief in the GTX750TI will still believe,so its all a moot point.

So at the current pricing of competing products,I will need to agree to disagree with them.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom