I don't think many deny human involvement in climate change, I think the question is to what degree.
Was the consequence of an industrial revolution catastrophic in terms of output from our perspective, quite definitely, however the relative impact is minor in comparison.
The issue appears to be that the "humans bad, animals good, plants better" idiotic mass public and the "god did it, not me" idiotic in-denial people of power do not view the entire picture from all perspectives and continue to keep their minds closed.
I dont understand the purpose of either stance, science is logic not sensationalism nor dismissal.