Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,165
- Location
- 3rd rock...
Hey guys could you offer some thoughts on this?
Ive heard and read a lot about how you "get better performance" if you let the graphics card take control of AA & Aniso filtering when it comes to games - as opposed to the application (ie the game) controlling it.
This has been suggested to me for FSX Acceleration and recently I read on a gaming forum about how it will help with TES: Skyrim
So I tried it out and my findings in Skyrim:
Application (Skyrim)-controlled AA=4, Aniso=4-----> very smooth game 35-40 FPS
AMD (Catalyst interface)-controlled AA=4, Aniso=4-----> 2 FPS
Yes thats right when telling my HD5850 to take care of AA & Aniso I was seeing about TWO frames/sec in Skyrim
Same abysmal performance in FSX.
Why is this..its not supposed to be like this
Why is my system ass-backwards lol.
Im not crying too much since app-controlled AA & aniso = smooth gameplay...just really shocked at the nonsense performance when telling the card to take care of things!
Oh and this was with the latest AMD drivers.

Ive heard and read a lot about how you "get better performance" if you let the graphics card take control of AA & Aniso filtering when it comes to games - as opposed to the application (ie the game) controlling it.
This has been suggested to me for FSX Acceleration and recently I read on a gaming forum about how it will help with TES: Skyrim
So I tried it out and my findings in Skyrim:
Application (Skyrim)-controlled AA=4, Aniso=4-----> very smooth game 35-40 FPS
AMD (Catalyst interface)-controlled AA=4, Aniso=4-----> 2 FPS
Yes thats right when telling my HD5850 to take care of AA & Aniso I was seeing about TWO frames/sec in Skyrim
Same abysmal performance in FSX.
Why is this..its not supposed to be like this

Im not crying too much since app-controlled AA & aniso = smooth gameplay...just really shocked at the nonsense performance when telling the card to take care of things!
Oh and this was with the latest AMD drivers.
