Glut of rubbish

Joined
11 Jan 2007
Posts
8,672
Location
*̡̡ı ̡̡͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡̡
Since it has become easier and cheaper to make a "feature" film due to digital capabilities, has anyone else noticed a huge glut of complete rubbish being released?

From one week to the next, there is some new inane "film" released "starring" Rambo or Mickey Rourke or Bruce Willis or Dolph Lundgren or other fairly popular actors from a few decades ago. Usually they are unwatchable rubbish designed for morons.

Seems there is very few films or programmes worth their salt these days due to it being much easier to do so. Perhaps it should be a lot harder?
 
Bruce Willis seems to be at the point where he's granting sexual favours for movie roles. Some of the crap he's been in lately is amazing.
 
Now it's all straight to streaming services and we don't have to make a huge effort to go watch a film we're just less choosy about what we watch. There was a load of guff out there before, we just avoided it (or never even knew about it). I do agree it seems to be much easier to churn out now though.

I think the desperation to be inclusive and some actors trying to captilise on their peak (maybe worried about the next scandal and getting "cancelled") is making quality suffer. Maybe it's my age but I am less and less satisifed by movies these days. I think we're at peak CGI and all the good ideas have been done better already becasue they didn't have a box tick list to go through before hand, they just went out and made the movies they wanted to.
 
It's just more accessible now, tbh. I was watching low budget 1984 vigilante movie Alley Cat just last night. A load of old ****, but also kind of awesome (and lots of unnecessary, but frankly spectacular, boobs).

There are hundreds of that sort of movie from prior eras.
 
It's just more accessible now, tbh. I was watching low budget 1984 vigilante movie Alley Cat just last night. A load of old ****, but also kind of awesome (and lots of unnecessary, but frankly spectacular, boobs).

There are hundreds of that sort of movie from prior eras.
80's movies were glorious for random boob, from Trading Places to Die Hard.. awesome
 
Not really, there was just as much rubbish before you just don't remember it.
This.

I've seen similar arguments every few years since I was first online, and remember reading stuff about it before then.

The main difference is you can find them with a few clicks on the likes of the streaming services rather than going to your local video rental store and picking them up out of the 50p a night wall.

Steven Segal has made his entire film career for much of the last 30 years making stuff with budgets so low they don't even use stock footage, or send someone out to the local airport but instead film a toy plane complete with visible strings.
 
Oh I have nothing against scale models, I love them, even when they're a little ropey due to the technology at the time etc. I've got books going into how the props for things like the BBC classic programmes*, Aliens and the Expanse were done.

My collection has a wide variety of films that use scale models and I love their use in films, ranging from the superb work in Bladerunner and Alien or Harryhausen's work, to the classic Robot Jox and Crash & Burn to Supershark where they did stop motion with what I'm fairly sure was a model (or possibly based on one) from one of the smaller "alternate universe" WW2 wargames.

But there is the use of scale models done to a professional standard, or with some actual effort, and getting a model aircraft from poundland, tying a bit of string to it and hanging it in front of a TV to get a shot in what is meant to have been a professionally done film in the 2000's, at a time when doing a greenscreen shot with a model could be done to a high standard with equipment and software your average film student (or amateur photographer) would have.
These days it's remarkably easy to find films that aren't even B or C movies, but a slight step up from student film projects:)

What I'm saying is that these days the cost, and ease of getting a film distributed so it's relatively easy to find is now low enough that things that at one point might have had an extremely limited release requiring you to hunt for them in the bargain section of your local video rental store are now almost as easy to find (sometimes easier) than major films because there is basically no cost involved in distribution, and the streaming services, and TV channels (to a lesser degree) are desperate for any content.


*VFX The story of the BBC visual effects Department by Mat Irving and Mike Tucker is an interesting read into both how the department worked, it's history, and how/why things were done as they were, IIRC it covers everything from the problems moving props in and out of the department, to short histories of how they made some of the classic props and effects, and why sometimes standard props changed from one episode to the next (due to things like realising half the guns in Blakes 7 that were needed for a scene were missing whilst on location and having to make them there and then). Another one is "Martin Bower's World of Models" covering Space 1999, Blake's 7, Alien and Flash Gordon in detail, along with a bunch of others (doctor who, tripods, hitchhikers guide to the galaxy for example).
 
Last edited:
Bruce Willis seems to be at the point where he's granting sexual favours for movie roles. Some of the crap he's been in lately is amazing.
It’s like those final salary pension workers that push for a promotion just before they retire, to secure a little nest egg.

They know they’re out of their depth, you know they’re out of their depth but it just … happens.
 
When i first got Netflix i just watched things not knowing any better, that was until i quickly found myself turning it off quicker and quicker each time.

Now i spend too long reading reviews when trawling through the endless guff that's on there.

The comment about Steven Seagal, haha, so true. He's a budget master :D
 
It's the same as before, loads of crap straight to video movies even in the 80s, streaming just makes them easier to find now
 
Steven Segal has made his entire film career for much of the last 30 years making stuff with budgets so low they don't even use stock footage, or send someone out to the local airport but instead film a toy plane complete with visible strings.

Weren't fat Seagal's movies rumoured to be a money laundering operation for the Eastern European and Russian mobs? On paper they have a budget in the millions, but in reality they cost nowhere near that to produce.
 
i think the quality of movies has definitely decreased in the last 2 decades - but its all gone into tv imo.
The last 20 years the quality of TV has been amazing - there have been so many excellent shows.
I'm old enough to remember when TV was truly garbage and you were lucky to get a couple of good shows a year, and now there are too many to watch.
 
80's and 90's best movies.


I think movies took a dive when CGI started taking over proper special effects, and then 20 years of capitalism and a youth growing up with no imagination, and we are where we are.

On the flip side I'd say TV shows are the best they have ever been.

Terminator 2 is my favourite movie, 1991, Shawshank Redemption 1994, Aliens 1986, Jurassic Park 1993, Back to the future, top gun, ET, Star Wars, Ghostbusters.... the list goes on.

I can't even think of a decent movie made in the last 20 years.
 
My biggest disappointment in "modern cinema" is just how few genuinely great screenwriters we have nowadays. A film can have hundreds of millions blown on the CGI budget but if the $100k script is crap the film will still bomb. For me studio's should concentrate more on hiring (or even training their own) better script writers as these relatively "low cost" aspects of a films budget make more of an impact no matter how much flashy CGI or the handsome lead actor is in a film.
 
Back
Top Bottom