What's made those photos stand out are technique and processing, not equipment.
i'd agree with you on that
i just dont agree that the camera is unimportant, and its not interesting to know what was used

What's made those photos stand out are technique and processing, not equipment.

Why oh why do people say this? It makes you sound like a complete retard.It made me do a sex wee![]()

Why oh why do people say this? It makes you sound like a complete retard.![]()
It's UGLY.
Hideous black front sill extensions, grey CSL wheels don't suit it, black paint over the chrome on a red car? WTF?
The M3 is fabulous in stock form but it looks like the owner has had a good taste bypass.

WTF are you talking about, since when has a carbon front CSL bumper been either bad taste or bad looking?
The red M3's bumper isnt stock and its also not a CS/CSL item. It's a standard M3 bumper with stick on CSL lookalike flippers.
EDIT: I may stand to be corrected, it might be a CS bumper, i thought both the CS and CSL had the same bumper.
I don't think it is stock.
The CS bumper doesn't have the black bits and the CSL has different holes in it.
It looks like a CS bumper with CSL bits stuck on the bottom to me.
Maybe this is me looking at it from a photographers point of view, not a petrolheads![]()
that's why i raised the question. the photos are down lighting, technique and processing as divine said, they could have been taken with any camera 

i am a photographer![]()
Photography is like the new web hosting![TW]Fox;11513596 said:Isn't everyone these days?Photography is like the new web hosting!
