Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The nvidia quadro range seem to start around £400 which is certainly out of my budget and perhaps the OPs. Only the older 512Mb GDDR3 ones come in around £100 and have many less cuda cores than the newer 560 series.
The detail was appreciated.
As I have a distinct lack of understanding in this area can someone explain why the Quadro 2000 would be better than say the GTX570 which has many more cuda cores?
cheers. Although looking at these results produced by Sony, the £200 GTX 570 looks to be a very good bet...... better than the £1500 Quadro 5000 (From a video editing with Vegas point of view)
Could you be a little clearer? Not quite got the jist
Thanks![]()
You haven't patronised me at all. In fact been very helpful in explaining a subject I have little knowledge on.
The Quadro cards are out of my league in price and I am no pro.......
As AndyOcUK said a Quadro is the preferred choice for professionals using the Adobe products. Having said that I'm a professional using Adobe CS6 and I bought a GTX670 for my latest build and its perfect.
Lots of full time Adobe user's use GTX570's and 580's as well, if you look at the Adobe Premiere Pro forums you will get a better idea. Some of the most well known posters on there stick to the GeForce cards.