There is London Ontario, and London Ohio, if you were referring to those and the one in U.K., you’d say “3 Londons.”
When I was driving a Black Cab, we referred to ourselves as London’s finest, cops in NYC are called New York’s finest.
Grammar question
- Thread starter psd99
- Start date
There is London Ontario, and London Ohio, if you were referring to those and the one in U.K., you’d say “3 Londons.”
When I was driving a Black Cab, we referred to ourselves as London’s finest, cops in NYC are called New York’s finest.
Man of Honour
Apostrophes in English mean one of two things:
1) Possession or association, which you now understand
"London's finest" without anything else is arguably incorrect because it's lacking the subject, but would usually be interpreted in context (e.g. if you're talking about parks, it'll be London's finest parks).
2) Deliberately missing letters, e.g. can't is actually can not - the apostrophe indicates that letters (in this case, a space,n and o) are deliberately missing. This usage is more complicated because it's based on common usage.
Adding an 's' to a word without an apostrophe makes it plural (although, of course, not all words are pluralised that way). So "Londons" means "more than one London" and in that context "finest" doesn't make much sense. It could be interpreted as "the finest <whatever the context is> in all of the places called "London" in the world and I'm not sure about how to show possession with a plural that ends in s".
"London's Finest". If the slogan is just that, then it's claiming that either the T-shirt or the person wearing it is the best in or from London, or at least amongst the best grouping in or from London. Is that your intended meaning?
Soldato
Please don’t put either option on a T-shirt for a stag night. You’ll all look a but special, irrespective of the spelling.
Soldato
But particularly special if it says "Londons Finest"
Thanks for that yes
It's actually not about london but about another city where I have seen the incorrect slogo written on and wanted to challenge it.
I really believed it should be London's Finest with the 's on the end.
#looks like that way is the correct way.
What? I can think of even fewer ways to use 'Londons's' than 'Londons'. And also with plural possessives (and things ending in s) you tend to drop the additional letter, e.g. [James' house] (using [] as quotes get lots with apostrophes.)
So for possessives for plurals, e.g. [These countries' residents need to move] is the same if [countries'] was replaced by [Londons']. [These Londons' residents need to move] - means all the residents of all the different places called London need to move. The residents are the possession of the (plural) Londons.
Yay grammar.
I was responding to the post immediately before mine, which was about how to refer to the finest from multiple places called London. “Londons’ finest”, “Londons’s finest” or avoiding that awkward looking construction entirely are the options.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Apr 2011
- Posts
- 459
London's either means finest in London or London is finest. As has already been said
Associate
Teacher knocks on pupil's door.
Teacher: Can I speak to your mum please?
Pupil: She ain't in.
Teacher: Where's your grammar?
Pupil: She ain't in either.
This made me laugh way too much after a day of teaching.
Soldato
Apostrophe Society Shutdown
I strongly feel GD had some part in the dimise of the society.
It's all you're fault.
I strongly feel GD had some part in the dimise of the society.
It's all you're fault.