Poll: Grammar Schools back on the table.

Should grammar schools be brought back in some form

  • Yes

    Votes: 200 71.7%
  • No

    Votes: 79 28.3%

  • Total voters
    279
Permabanned
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Posts
15,459
The Education Secretary, Justine Greening has just all but confirmed the Conservative will pursue a policy of reintroducing Grammar Schools.

How do people feel about this?
 
I think in general it's a good idea but they need to be very careful how selection is handled, the old 11+ was too blunt a tool
 
Que 20 years from now "Grammar schools to be phased out, turned into Academies".

What a tragic waste of time.

Government needs to take a step back from Education for awhile, i don't see how teachers can possibly get meaningful data/results if the goal posts/rules/whatever change every 5 (or less) years.
 
Not everyone is academically gifted. Rather than trying to meet the needs of those who are and who aren't in the same school and failing both, they'll now be better able to focus on what kids actually need.

I accept that children are of differing abilities.

This will just create a two tier education system with the best teachers only wanting to teach in grammar schools, further harming the futures of children.
 
Not everyone is academically gifted. Rather than trying to meet the needs of those who are and who aren't in the same school and failing both, they'll now be better able to focus on what kids actually need.

True but then you have the mixed ability of pupils where those that are still able but maybe less naturally gifted, etc. can learn from what the brighter ones do, etc. if you lump all the not so good ones into one group they have less to measure themselves against and/or inspiration for doing better.

Tories need to stop/be a lot more careful of meddling with education TBH - despite any good intentions or merits of a particular idea the meddling just does more to undo all that - the net effect is actually more negative.
 
Last edited:
True but then you have the mixed ability of pupils where those that are still able but maybe less naturally gifted, etc. can learn from what the brighter ones do, etc. if you lump all the not so good ones into one group they have less to measure themselves against and/or inspiration for doing better.

That doesn't work at all in my experience.
 
I don't understand this either.

Justine Greening has just said grammar schools will give parents the choice of where they send their children to school.

How can you have choice and selection?
 
I went to a grammar school back in the 80s. It was a great education for those that wanted it (I didn't want it :D ). The way I saw it, my school offered me an education that was on a par with private schools - an opportunity I would never have had as I came from a poor family.

The changes that I've noticed from then is that all of us in the 80s lived within the borough the school was in. When we were looking at schools for my sons 10 years ago, I asked the school board of our local grammar what percentage of new entrants were from within the borough - the answer was 30%. Some came from as far away as Scotland and had lodgings close by.

When you have a school that promises to output a greater percentage of high achievers, some parents will go to enormous lengths to get their children enrolled. I'm not sure that's necessarily fair. Fix that and I'm all for them.
 
Another bizarre argument just been put forward is that we need grammar schools becasue we are short of capacity in current schools.
 
Back
Top Bottom