Gran Turismo 5 Screenshot/Video Showcase [hi-res warning]

[rchads89]

From the screenshots graphics look sweet on this game.

 

[Simon]

They aren't ingame graphics though

 

[DAIR]

They aren't ingame graphics though

Looks the same whilst playing to me.

 

[Mr Men]

Looks the same whilst playing to me.

LOL don't be silly

 

[CliffyBiro]

Doesn't look far off it...

EDIT: The race taken ones that is. Like...

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_mn1RKOsovcY/TPWHligbozI/AAAAAAAAAJk/d7TvPZkvzik/Circuito de Madrid.jpg

 

[Flubble]

standard cars look a bit poo with jagged edges all over them, but the premium cars look near real and so do the tracks

 

[CliffyBiro]

standard cars look a bit poo with jagged edges all over them, but the premium cars look near real and so do the tracks

Depends on the standard. Some look terrible, some don't look bad at all.

 

[Dancula]

The game when in motion looks very good.

 

[Ryan-3]

Heres a few shots frome me. The standard cars aren't at all as good as the premium, but ain't too bad from a distance

One of my little EK(now changed ), NSX racing an Evora, and my Cappuccino (RM)

 

[K1LLSW1TCH]

People who haven't played this game seem to think that the photo mode graphics are massively better than the actual gameplay graphics. The models are exactly the same, they just add a bit more anti aliasing and a few other little effects but they aren't a world away from the in game graphics. They are both impressive and apart from the occasional dodgy shadows and some of the standard cars the graphics are great. It also needs to be mentioned that the standard cars vary in quality, some are admittedly a bit poo and others don't look bad at all, the Veyron for example looks really nice and if it had a cockpit cam could almost pass as a premium model. As others have said the game in motion looks sweet, really nice indeed and to hint that the photo mode graphics are a world away from the actual game is doing GT5 a disservice.

 

[dunker]

look what popped up in the used cars

 

[GreenMint]

Edit: Wrong thread

 

[DAIR]

People who haven't played this game seem to think that the photo mode graphics are massively better than the actual gameplay graphics. The models are exactly the same, they just add a bit more anti aliasing and a few other little effects but they aren't a world away from the in game graphics. They are both impressive and apart from the occasional dodgy shadows and some of the standard cars the graphics are great. It also needs to be mentioned that the standard cars vary in quality, some are admittedly a bit poo and others don't look bad at all, the Veyron for example looks really nice and if it had a cockpit cam could almost pass as a premium model. As others have said the game in motion looks sweet, really nice indeed and to hint that the photo mode graphics are a world away from the actual game is doing GT5 a disservice.

Have to agree.

Some people are just deeply indenial!

 

[DBT85]

Heres a few shots frome me. The standard cars aren't at all as good as the premium, but ain't too bad from a distance

One of my little EK(now changed ), NSX racing an Evora, and my Cappuccino (RM)

http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o437/ryankerrigan/Kyoto-Gion.jpg[ /IMG]

[IMG]http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o437/ryankerrigan/SpecialStageRoute7.jpg[ /IMG]
[/QUOTE]

dude what are you focusing on here?

 

[Faztastic]

Here is a few of mine

 

[K1LLSW1TCH]

I like the first shot, but the other two make my want to rub my eyes, did you forget to use the focusing?

 

[Sp00n]

Isn't that the "miniature" setting which should only really be used from a distance otherwise the photo's look pap?

 

[DAIR]

Some of you need to show a tad of consideration..... Im using a laptop to view this thread lol

 

[CliffyBiro]

I think he used the Vaseline option.

 

[Sp00n]

Couple of my R33 monster