GRAW2 Demo up on PSN

NokkonWud said:
What kind of ******* comment is that? I'm right.
Click to expand...

Of course you are???

And you wonder why certain posters get on your back regarding your so called "unbiased opinions" :rolleyes:

As I've already said GRAW 2 looks poor on the PS3 compared to the 360 version but to claim "it's the games that make a console" is just absurd, especially with the reliability of the 360.

Maybe I just refuse to spend money on junk?
 
Jihad said:
Reliability doesn't make it a bad console, it makes it an unreliable one.

Apart from the reliability it's a kickass console.
Click to expand...

LOL, what that 'minor' flaw?

Junk is junk no matter how you gloss over it..

Not much point having great games when your console is currently sitting for nearly a month (or longer) in some warehouse being repaired...
 
NokkonWud said:
Then I don't possibly see how I was being a drama queen.
Click to expand...
By naming myself and Edz you were being a drama queen. I had no intention of commenting on GRAW 2, therefore you were assuming things and being a drama queen.
 
It is the games that make the console ffs look at the PS2! the hardware was a piece of **** compared to the competitors but it had the stronger software(GAMES).
When a company is selling the console at a loss(the trend these days) where the hell do you think they make their money back? OH MY THEY MAKE IT ON THE GAMES! :eek:

Don't suppose thats bullet pointed in the Sonyboy pamphlet is it?
NokkonWud is right end of.
 
JBeck said:
By naming myself and Edz you were being a drama queen. I had no intention of commenting on GRAW 2, therefore you were assuming things and being a drama queen.
Click to expand...
I was commenting on the fact I had a valid point towards the negativity of a PS3 game. Every time I have done so thus far either of you have had comments to make, I was merely saying it tongue in cheek at the time. Not being a drama queen.

I really could care less what people say.
 
NokkonWud said:
I was commenting on the fact I had a valid point towards the negativity of a PS3 game. Every time I have done so thus far either of you have had comments to make, I was merely saying it tongue in cheek at the time. Not being a drama queen.

I really could care less what people say.
Click to expand...
You have been making negative comments regarding PS3 for a lot longer than I have 360, so 'every time i have done so thus' is hardly accurate.
 
JBeck said:
You have been making negative comments regarding PS3 for a lot longer than I have 360, so 'every time i have done so thus' is hardly accurate.
Click to expand...

Huh? I've never mentioned you being negative to the Xbox360...
 
Edz said:
Why?
Click to expand...

Lol, what kind of a statement is "Junk is junk no matter how you gloss over it.. ?". The 360 may have it's hardware flaws but when it works as it should (as mine has done for 18+ months without hiccup) it's a fantastic piece of kit.

I just found that a bit of a ridiculous thing to say.
 
NokkonWud said:
Huh? I've never mentioned you being negative to the Xbox360...
Click to expand...
The point is, I have only been knocking your PS3 comments for as long as i have been fed up with MS screwing me, which is only a few months. You've been dissing the PS3 for as long as I can remember.
 
@NokkonWud
I just did a little side by side comparison and I take what I said back :P 360 version does look better, with better lighting and blur effects. But from what I see, the frame rate at least holds up in this port; granted this isn't a particularly crazy level.
 
smcshaw said:
Lol, what kind of a statement is "Junk is junk no matter how you gloss over it.. ?". The 360 may have it's hardware flaws but when it works as it should (as mine has done for 18+ months without hiccup) it's a fantastic piece of kit.

I just found that a bit of a ridiculous thing to say.
Click to expand...

I think he meant to say;

"You cant polish S***"

Josh
 
JBeck said:
The point is, I have only been knocking your PS3 comments for as long as i have been fed up with MS screwing me, which is only a few months. You've been dissing the PS3 for as long as I can remember.
Click to expand...

No I haven't. I haven't dissed the PS3 once infact (or if I have I cannot remember, nor do I know why I would). I have dissed the controller and Resistance: Fall of Man. As a console I haven't dissed it once, infact, I believe I have only ever praised the console.

I've pointed this out again and you continually claim that I have when I clearly haven't.
 
This game sucks on ps3, another poor 360 port job. Seriously don't buy 360 to ps3 ubisoft ports, I don't think these guys could program a vcr to turn on and record eastenders nevermind do a decent conversion. Graw on 360 was awesome, didn't like the sequel at all and I won't buy a ubisoft ps3 title again until haze comes out, even assassins creed has disaster written all over it for both consoles, lazy buggers.
 
Last edited:
Haze isn't made by Ubisoft, it's only published by them so any faults with that are solely down to Free Radical Design, not Ubi.

Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter 2 was also made by Red Storm Entertainment alongside Ubisoft Paris, so your point towards that is perhaps valid. It's definitely disappointing and I was shocked at the lack of sharpness in the visuals which is a shame, especially after NGS which has razor sharp visuals (albeit on an older, less intensive engine), but it does stand out as a sore point.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the heads up Nokkon, and yeah I knew doak & the free radicals are behind Haze thats the only reason I'll buy it. Anything that is a 360 port that is handled by ubisoft internal dev teams is not woth the plastic its pressed on.
 
Looked and played pretty good to me, i didnt notice any frame rate dips. It auto defaulted to 720p for my tv.

Only thing i thought was that it looked a bit dark compared to the 360 one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom