Its not his negativity (which is mind boggling) its the fact that he cannot actually back it up with any proof or useful points of discussion. Its always just "Sancho is ****, rubbish signing". Sancho today was brilliant at times but I'm sure that will have completely passed him by.
Criticism is fine and god knows we deserve a lot of it over the past few years but it has to be valid and relevant.
I mean I’m not TRMs biggest fan but isn’t this the same? “Sancho was brilliant at times” but nothing actually backing that up?
Granted I’m going off stats but he barely touched the ball and when he did he lost it 25% of the time. Didn’t create a chance, didn’t have a shot on or off target and won 50% of his ground duels.
If he was “brilliant at times” then when?
Sounds like a passenger to me.