Money = Talent according to them when evidently it doesnt because Havertz is awful.Why do the presenters and commentators keep going on about this so called attacking talent that Chelsea have? I see a lot of headless chickens and players who aren’t good enough, not seeing this abundance of talent they supposedly have.
They don’t score goals.
Should have kept tuchel...Potter is a nothing manager, few decent results at Brighton and wants to play billy big balls. 600 million match day squad and can’t score a goal against Tim Ream who is 50 years old. LOL.
they look **** at the moment and probably will for a while, but with that team I wouldn’t be surprised if they were close to winning the title next yearThere's no balance in that team at all.
No team cohesion.
Reliant on individual brilliance to pick up points.
Is there a leader in that squad?
Again based off what?they look **** at the moment and probably will for a while, but with that team I wouldn’t be surprised if they were close to winning the title next year
Just a feeling I have, hence why I said “I wouldn’t be surprised”Again based off what?
I keep hearing how good these players are yet no one has seen enough of the likes of Mudryk to make a shout thay they will go from where they are to a title challenge. They don't even have a striker ffs.
May be Boehly thinks Potter is the English Pep and can win titles with no strikers so didn't buy any for him.
You literally said "but with that team" hence my question.Just a feeling I have, hence why I said “I wouldn’t be surprised”
Nah we going to win the league after we sign Rice, Bellingham and Kane in the summerthey look **** at the moment and probably will for a while, but with that team I wouldn’t be surprised if they were close to winning the
with the players they have brought in, who do seem to be talented, I wouldn’t be surprised of they were challengingYou literally said "but with that team" hence my question.