Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 41,241
- Location
- Cornwall
PGMOL have already said they couldn't get an angle on the player so they went with the on field decision
PGMOL have already said they couldn't get an angle on the player so they went with the on field decision
Despite them using technology on the wrong player?
Honestly what a mess
I have the square root of **** all sympathy for any footballers breaking any of the COVID rules. They are paid insane money by anyones standards and they work a part time job. They train, play and rest.
Glad to see some managers taking some actual action against players who knowingly break the rules.
It's because they couldn't see the correct player, they couldn't draw a line so had to go with the on field decision, it's nothing to do with drawing a line on the wrong player really.
They didn't need to see the ball, they can check when the ball was played from another frame, you do need to see the player though. As much as people want to knock VAR, they done nothing wrong there. If you cannot see the player, you can't overturn the decision. This was an incident where an audio feed allowing us to hear the discussions going on would have helped though.You could?
They said Liverpool's goal was offside at the weekend and couldn't even see the ball.
I'd hope they have massive fines, before a potentially huge game as well, as a team mate I'd be absolutely fuming.
To say before tonight Everton had a chance of getting top 4 says a lot about the league. Dire.
They didn't need to see the ball, they can check when the ball was played from another frame, you do need to see the player though. As much as people want to knock VAR, they done nothing wrong there. If you cannot see the player, you can't overturn the decision. This was an incident where an audio feed allowing us to hear the discussions going on would have helped though.
The part we can see shows he's onside, I'm not sure how a deeper part would be needed. Can't they just use the attacker as the deepest point and see how it's not offside?
We don't need to surely. It's so obvious why do you even need a line??!
Since when did var just decide whether somebody was offside by looking at a picture? The process is they need to plot the furthest foward part of the defender and the furthest forward part of the forward - no camera angle allowed them to do that and that's why it couldn't be used.The part we can see shows he's onside, I'm not sure how a deeper part would be needed. Can't they just use the attacker as the deepest point and see how it's not offside?
Since when did var just decide whether somebody was offside by looking at a picture? The process is they need to plot the furthest foward part of the defender and the furthest forward part of the forward - no camera angle allowed them to do that and that's why it couldn't be used.