-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
gta benchmark thread anyone?
- Thread starter MasterOC
- Start date
http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/grand-theft-auto-v-test-gpu.html
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gta-v-pc-graphics-performance-review,6.html
Nvidia on top it seems. Titan X killing it.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gta-v-pc-graphics-performance-review,6.html
Nvidia on top it seems. Titan X killing it.
Actually, the benchmark does sort of work. But I believe you need to be outside of a mission (meaning you need to play the game a little first before you can run it) and it'll quit after doing the benchmark.
It showed an fps counter during the benchmark, and saved a file to Documents\Rockstar Games\GTA V\Benchmarks:
It showed an fps counter during the benchmark, and saved a file to Documents\Rockstar Games\GTA V\Benchmarks:
Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg
Pass 0, 37.504520, 93.277695, 59.696781
Pass 1, 24.045866, 78.015182, 58.534477
Pass 2, 34.173729, 65.429230, 59.655052
Pass 3, 27.074049, 109.811943, 59.844139
Pass 4, 6.421223, 149.335083, 59.106941
Time in milliseconds(ms). (Lower is better). Min, Max, Avg
Pass 0, 10.720676, 26.663452, 16.751322
Pass 1, 12.818018, 41.587189, 17.083948
Pass 2, 15.283689, 29.262243, 16.763039
Pass 3, 9.106478, 36.935738, 16.710073
Pass 4, 6.696350, 155.733582, 16.918488
Frames under 16ms (for 60fps):
Pass 0: 16/563 frames (2.84%)
Pass 1: 11/547 frames (2.01%)
Pass 2: 27/564 frames (4.79%)
Pass 3: 17/562 frames (3.02%)
Pass 4: 197/6780 frames (2.91%)
Frames under 33ms (for 30fps):
Pass 0: 563/563 frames (100.00%)
Pass 1: 544/547 frames (99.45%)
Pass 2: 564/564 frames (100.00%)
Pass 3: 560/562 frames (99.64%)
Pass 4: 6745/6780 frames (99.48%)
Percentiles in ms for pass 0
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 16.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 17.00
95%, 17.00
96%, 17.00
97%, 18.00
98%, 20.00
99%, 22.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 1
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 16.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 18.00
92%, 19.00
93%, 20.00
94%, 20.00
95%, 21.00
96%, 23.00
97%, 24.00
98%, 26.00
99%, 29.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 2
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 17.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 17.00
95%, 17.00
96%, 17.00
97%, 17.00
98%, 18.00
99%, 21.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 3
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 16.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 17.00
95%, 17.00
96%, 18.00
97%, 18.00
98%, 20.00
99%, 24.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 4
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 17.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 18.00
95%, 19.00
96%, 20.00
97%, 22.00
98%, 24.00
99%, 28.00
=== SYSTEM ===
Windows 8.1 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200)
DX Feature Level: 11.0
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz (12 CPUs), ~3.3GHz
16384MB RAM
AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (AMD Radeon R9 295X2), 8522MB, Driver Version 14.502.1014.0
Graphics Card Vendor Id 0x1002 with Device ID 0x67b9
=== SETTINGS ===
Display: 2560x1440 (FullScreen) @ 60Hz VSync ON
Tessellation: 2
LodScale: 1.000000
PedLodBias: 0.200000
VehicleLodBias: 0.000000
ShadowQuality: 2
ReflectionQuality: 2
ReflectionMSAA: 0
SSAO: 2
AnisotropicFiltering: 16
MSAA: 4
MSAAFragments: 0
MSAAQuality: 0
TextureQuality: 2
ParticleQuality: 1
WaterQuality: 1
GrassQuality: 2
ShaderQuality: 1
Shadow_SoftShadows: 4
UltraShadows_Enabled: false
Shadow_ParticleShadows: true
Shadow_Distance: 1.000000
Shadow_LongShadows: false
Shadow_SplitZStart: 0.930000
Shadow_SplitZEnd: 0.890000
Shadow_aircraftExpWeight: 0.990000
Shadow_DisableScreenSizeCheck: false
Reflection_MipBlur: true
FXAA_Enabled: false
TXAA_Enabled: false
Lighting_FogVolumes: true
Shader_SSA: true
DX_Version: 2
CityDensity: 1.000000
PedVarietyMultiplier: 1.000000
VehicleVarietyMultiplier: 1.000000
PostFX: 2
DoF: true
HdStreamingInFlight: false
MaxLodScale: 0.000000
MotionBlurStrength: 0.000000
Pass 0, 37.504520, 93.277695, 59.696781
Pass 1, 24.045866, 78.015182, 58.534477
Pass 2, 34.173729, 65.429230, 59.655052
Pass 3, 27.074049, 109.811943, 59.844139
Pass 4, 6.421223, 149.335083, 59.106941
Time in milliseconds(ms). (Lower is better). Min, Max, Avg
Pass 0, 10.720676, 26.663452, 16.751322
Pass 1, 12.818018, 41.587189, 17.083948
Pass 2, 15.283689, 29.262243, 16.763039
Pass 3, 9.106478, 36.935738, 16.710073
Pass 4, 6.696350, 155.733582, 16.918488
Frames under 16ms (for 60fps):
Pass 0: 16/563 frames (2.84%)
Pass 1: 11/547 frames (2.01%)
Pass 2: 27/564 frames (4.79%)
Pass 3: 17/562 frames (3.02%)
Pass 4: 197/6780 frames (2.91%)
Frames under 33ms (for 30fps):
Pass 0: 563/563 frames (100.00%)
Pass 1: 544/547 frames (99.45%)
Pass 2: 564/564 frames (100.00%)
Pass 3: 560/562 frames (99.64%)
Pass 4: 6745/6780 frames (99.48%)
Percentiles in ms for pass 0
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 16.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 17.00
95%, 17.00
96%, 17.00
97%, 18.00
98%, 20.00
99%, 22.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 1
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 16.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 18.00
92%, 19.00
93%, 20.00
94%, 20.00
95%, 21.00
96%, 23.00
97%, 24.00
98%, 26.00
99%, 29.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 2
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 17.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 17.00
95%, 17.00
96%, 17.00
97%, 17.00
98%, 18.00
99%, 21.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 3
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 16.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 17.00
95%, 17.00
96%, 18.00
97%, 18.00
98%, 20.00
99%, 24.00
Percentiles in ms for pass 4
50%, 16.00
75%, 16.00
80%, 16.00
85%, 17.00
90%, 17.00
91%, 17.00
92%, 17.00
93%, 17.00
94%, 18.00
95%, 19.00
96%, 20.00
97%, 22.00
98%, 24.00
99%, 28.00
=== SYSTEM ===
Windows 8.1 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200)
DX Feature Level: 11.0
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz (12 CPUs), ~3.3GHz
16384MB RAM
AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (AMD Radeon R9 295X2), 8522MB, Driver Version 14.502.1014.0
Graphics Card Vendor Id 0x1002 with Device ID 0x67b9
=== SETTINGS ===
Display: 2560x1440 (FullScreen) @ 60Hz VSync ON
Tessellation: 2
LodScale: 1.000000
PedLodBias: 0.200000
VehicleLodBias: 0.000000
ShadowQuality: 2
ReflectionQuality: 2
ReflectionMSAA: 0
SSAO: 2
AnisotropicFiltering: 16
MSAA: 4
MSAAFragments: 0
MSAAQuality: 0
TextureQuality: 2
ParticleQuality: 1
WaterQuality: 1
GrassQuality: 2
ShaderQuality: 1
Shadow_SoftShadows: 4
UltraShadows_Enabled: false
Shadow_ParticleShadows: true
Shadow_Distance: 1.000000
Shadow_LongShadows: false
Shadow_SplitZStart: 0.930000
Shadow_SplitZEnd: 0.890000
Shadow_aircraftExpWeight: 0.990000
Shadow_DisableScreenSizeCheck: false
Reflection_MipBlur: true
FXAA_Enabled: false
TXAA_Enabled: false
Lighting_FogVolumes: true
Shader_SSA: true
DX_Version: 2
CityDensity: 1.000000
PedVarietyMultiplier: 1.000000
VehicleVarietyMultiplier: 1.000000
PostFX: 2
DoF: true
HdStreamingInFlight: false
MaxLodScale: 0.000000
MotionBlurStrength: 0.000000
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
I see 295x on top
nice seeing how close performance is across the board. Rockstar really went to work on this game.
Just ran the bench on my 780 everything maxed except Msaa on 2 and saw 3071 vram usage and 5.4gb of system ram used and also 9gb of page file used just to run the benchmark 
Anyone with stuttering issues may need more than 4gb of system ram and a large ( or system managed ) pagefile.
Anyone with stuttering issues may need more than 4gb of system ram and a large ( or system managed ) pagefile.
I see 295x on top
Top multi GPU yeah, but need SLI results to compare.
Nice to see the GOAT Titan X so close to a dual card whilst using about half the power
Awesome game, really impressed with the work gone into the PC version. AMD drivers are absolutely fantastic for this release, single card and crossfire 
Also nice to see it in black and white that 3GB cards are now obsolete for 1080P, max settings.
Also nice to see it in black and white that 3GB cards are now obsolete for 1080P, max settings.
Nope, 295X on top at the higher resolutions, linking the graphs from the links in your post:
Not bad when you consider the 295X is half the price huh
I think you are missing the point
4 GM200 chips v 4 Hawaii chips is a total mismatch and anyone considering such a system would not be worried about the extra cost of the NVidia cards.
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2014
- Posts
- 210
Meh, you didn't even enable AA did you?
Maximum or go home.
Okay, this time maximum.
What screen size are you running? The mem use is puny comparatively.
Would be nice to know why the 295x2 is seemingly incapable of keeping its stock clocks in this game at 4k, i've bumped the power level to +50 and it only seems to stick to 1018mhz for a few moments before bouncing around all over the place. The benchmark run is farsical with core clocks going to 500mhz in some instances. 
And yes thats with the new driver.
Video currently uploading at 2160p
And yes thats with the new driver.Video currently uploading at 2160p
Last edited:
Guru3d seems to be the outlier site with GTA V
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/GTA-5...219948/Tests/GTA-5-PC-Test-Benchmark-1156215/
http://pclab.pl/art57777.html
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.ph...-angespielt-inklusive-benchmarks.html?start=2
http://www.gamersnexus.net/game-bench/1905-gta-v-pc-fps-benchmark-graphics-cards
http://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficzne/jakie_sa_wymagania_sprzetowe_gta_v_test_wydajnosci?page=0,3
http://www.sweclockers.com/artikel/20336-snabbtest-grafikprestanda-i-gta-v/1
http://www.nordichardware.se/Grafik...grafikkortsprestanda-i-vackra-los-santos.html
http://www.computerbase.de/2015-04/...rgleich/2/#diagramm-frametimes-1920-1080-fxaa
CB are the only ones with frame times so the jury is still out on those:
E: swe has frame times too, slightly favoring AMD.
Probably just average the scores from different reviews for the best overall idea.
Last edited:
Err, I think you're missing the point buddy.
Most people in the market for high end GPU's would buy one TitanX or 295X2. A very small amount of people would buy two of each. In both cases, the 295x2 outperforms the TitanX in GTA5, this is fact.
I'd argue that the amount of people who buy 4 TitanX's is less than 0.01% of the userbase - so for the 99% of us, the 295X2 is the clearer winner in GTA5.
