Guide on how to move Firefox to secondary drive.

spixelspixel

spixelspixel

spixelspixel

Associate
Joined
10 Jan 2012
Posts
2,375
Over the past few days I've been trying to figure out how to completely move firefox to another drive to reduce writes on my ssd. I know the impact on the ssd will be minimal but it still bothered me as I use firefox a lot and resource monitor shows it constantly writing even more than windows itself.


Here's a quick and easy guide from what I've learned. This cut the daily writes to my ssd in half from 14gb to 7gb.



1. Move the Cache.
-------------------

Type about:config in the firefox address bar.

Right click anywhere and select new string. Enter browser.cache.disc.parent_directory and select ok. In the next box enter the location of your other drive, for example D:\
It you enter something like D:\firefoxcache then you will need to create that folder beforehand, it doesn't make one automatically.



2. Move your firefox profile.
------------------------------

Go to C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles

Move the folder (for example jkwhcnsajs.default) to your new drive location.

Go to C:\Users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox

Open the 'profile' configuration file.

Change 'Isrelative' from 1 to 0
Change 'Path=' to the location which you moved your profile to. For example D:\Firefoxprofile\jkwhcnsajs.default

Save and close.




Firefox will never wite to your main drive anymore!

2zqze41.png
 
Last edited:
Thank you for this, I have a 30gb SSD, which was fine when my pc was just being used for media duties. However now it is my main pc and anything to get stuff off the SSD is important until I can upgrade.

Sat with about 200mb free atm!
 
I stopped using this tweak a few years ago after reinstalling windows, didn't bother to use it. Well guess what, my ssd died most likely due to the massive amount of writes from firefox. If you have more than 1 drive definitely put your firefox profile on another drive to even out the writes. Firefox and windows writes a lot to your drive and will kill it eventually. My SSD health is still reported as 100% health even though it is out of spare blocks so don't rely on the smart info, put your browser files on another drive!
 
You can also decrease the frequency of autosaves for crash recovery from default (was it 15s) that was established as main culprit (places/sessionstore files ) - see earlier posts
and tell it to use ram for caching of bitmaps.
the former, I found, makes it a lot more responsive too (which moving profile alone will not) since you are avoiding slowing it down for IO (even if some are a asynchronous/threads)
 
jpaul said:
You can also decrease the frequency of autosaves for crash recovery from default (was it 15s) that was established as main culprit (places/sessionstore files ) - see earlier posts
and tell it to use ram for caching of bitmaps.
the former, I found, makes it a lot more responsive too (which moving profile alone will not) since you are avoiding slowing it down for IO (even if some are a asynchronous/threads)
Click to expand...

The history + cache still writes a very large amount even with the the crash recovery changed. If you look at the screenshot I posted originally, the highest write is from places.sqlite which is history. Session store is third
 
I have a 250GB 850 EVO as my OS drive and IIRC, it's rated for 75TB worth of writes over 5 years. I've used nothing but firefox and have re-installed windows more times than I care to remember (keep dabbling with 10 and then going back to 8.1 :p).... and so far, I've written 13.5TB in 2 years and 3 months. That's nothing so I'll just continue as I am. If it fails, it fails. I have backups so wouldn't lose anything.
 
marc2003 said:
I have a 250GB 850 EVO as my OS drive and IIRC, it's rated for 75TB worth of writes over 5 years. I've used nothing but firefox and have re-installed windows more times than I care to remember (keep dabbling with 10 and then going back to 8.1 :p).... and so far, I've written 13.5TB in 2 years and 3 months. That's nothing so I'll just continue as I am. If it fails, it fails. I have backups so wouldn't lose anything.
Click to expand...

The endurance stats mean nothing,I've experienced that first hand. This is my faulty ssd. Everything seemed fine then all of a sudden it went faulty. 850 evo will probably last longer than my sandisk extreme ii but you best believe that the writes from your browser is really having an impact on the ssd lifespan.

91CDx4a.png
 
spixelspixel said:
The history + cache still writes a very large amount even with the the crash recovery changed. If you look at the screenshot I posted originally, the highest write is from places.sqlite which is history. Session store is third
Click to expand...

Are they ordered by bytes total during that 1s period ? ... having a discrete/small png in the list is odd.

just looked and surprisingly chrome is currently my bad guy

41092274351_1d1bd9b843_b_d.jpg


the 160Kb/s you have is much bigger than 64Kb/s ff I have, more significantly - over the 4day session ~ 50 tabs has been open, average is 3Kb/s total 12GB, if my calc is right.
edit suppose
edit: computer is asleep 10 hrs a day, so probably more like 6Kb/s avg
 
Last edited:
spixelspixel said:
The endurance stats mean nothing,I've experienced that first hand.
Click to expand...

They're relevant for my warranty. It's 5 years or 75TB written - whichever comes first. I'm clearly not going to break the 75TB barrier any time soon so if the drive fails in the first 5 years then I should be able to RMA it. If the drive pops after 5 years even with the data written being much lower than the advertised rate... then so be it. It was bought back in the good old days when they were 60 quid. :p
 
marc2003 said:
They're relevant for my warranty. It's 5 years or 75TB written - whichever comes first. I'm clearly not going to break the 75TB barrier any time soon so if the drive fails in the first 5 years then I should be able to RMA it. If the drive pops after 5 years even with the data written being much lower than the advertised rate... then so be it. It was bought back in the good old days when they were 60 quid. :p
Click to expand...

Still if you moved the browser off it, the ssd could last 10 years instead of 5. Its not nice having something go faulty out of the blue and go through the hassle of getting a replacement knowing it could have been prevented :-( I've got my browser on an el cheapo 64gb ssd now having put in a new main drive.

I guess its not that much of a big deal though if it was 60 quid, my one was almost 300, for 480gb in 2013
 
Last edited:
Yep, late 2015 really was the peak time to be buying SSDs. I'm pretty sure after I bought my first one for 60 quid, it got reduced to 50 on special offer the next week. :rolleyes: Then a few months later, prices started getting silly like 90 quid on OcUK so I bought another locally for 75. Roll on 2 years... £110. Madness.... :D

I suppose given today's prices, I should be more considerate. :o
 
I'll just continue as-is, for me the whole point of having a fast SSD is that the entire system benefits from that performance.
 
marc2003 said:
Yep, late 2015 really was the peak time to be buying SSDs
Click to expand...
noticed OC seems to have 500gb evo 850 at £120 - not bad.

... putting the windows swap on the cheap ssd, if you do lots of multi-tasking, maybe more important than FF,
have never looked to see how many read/writes are down to the OS.

edit afterthought
spixelspixel said:
the highest write is from places.sqlite which is history.
Click to expand...
if it is genuinly this that has most actvity it may be corrupted eg
I generally do not keep more than a couple of months of history - places gets large with lots of writes/stalls when it is updated.
 
Last edited:
jpaul said:
noticed OC seems to have 500gb evo 850 at £120 - not bad.

... putting the windows swap on the cheap ssd, if you do lots of multi-tasking, maybe more important than FF,
have never looked to see how many read/writes are down to the OS.

edit afterthought

if it is genuinly this that has most actvity it may be corrupted eg
I generally do not keep more than a couple of months of history - places gets large with lots of writes/stalls when it is updated.
Click to expand...

Firefox updates the history every time you visit a site, so have task manager resources open on disk activiity, open a website and watch all the writes by places.sqlite. The screenshot I posted isn't average writes its current after loading a site. This was taken in 2013 though so firefox may have been adjusted a bit but still, if you browse for hours daily firefox will cut your ssd lifespan in half
 
Last edited:
Yeah that'd work. An old small SSD as a scratch disk in effect.

A RAMDisk could be pretty easily set to sync against permanent storage in the background.
 
spixelspixel said:
You can get the same performance and prolong the lifespan by putting your browser profile on a cheap secondary ssd
Click to expand...

My 960 Evo was £100, it doesn't make sense to spend £30-40 on another SSD just to marginally prolong the life of it. If it fails in 5 years time I'll just buy whatever's current at the time.

If Firefox was writing tens or hundreds of GBs to it each day then I'd be more concerned, but having sat with Task Manager and Resource Monitor open in the background for the past hour or so the disk usage is completely fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom