Hannity vs Choudry

Hannity is the worst of a bad news channel, he loads questions, creates false choices and says terribly patronisting things like "let me educate you because you are ignorant" to his guests. If you dont go with his line of question he cuts you off or talks over you
I wouldnt even call it News, its click bait at best, and worse than even the OMG OUTRAGE inducing Daily Mail

Choudary is a terrible guest on any news channel also - as he will just bark his rhetoric over and over again and never answer any question posed to him
More fool fox news for not understanding that he is an uncontrolable guest that should not be given opertunities to rant on tv

an entirely pointless video
 
Fox news and Andy Choudary on the same screen at once, I managed to watch about 10 seconds until I felt like skinning myself.
 
Last edited:
I don't know who / what is worse.

Two people that promote terrorism on opposing sides shouting over each other.....avoids.
 
Behead them both.

The other video in post #12. "Swings his hands to show he is far to the left." Hold on, i'll get the foil. Let us make a hat.
 
Last edited:
uVdpNWS.jpg


Gotta love anjem. :D
 
OhEsEcks said:
Is he a qualified psychoanalyst? Or just another conspiracy nut that sits at home and makes youtube videos?
Click to expand...

What? :confused:

Firstly you don't have to be a qualified psychoanalyst to be able to pick out a bull*****er, rather have experience communicating with lots of different people. I pick up on the crap Hannity uses every other day, its not some secret.

Secondly, he's not conspiring against anyone or anything. The actions of Hannity are there in video and are being explained on the fly.

Again, absolutely astounding how you manage to think that the person providing an analysis is a "conspiracy nut" even though the powers of the subconscious mind are well studied and documented.

However, your comment simply proves what I said earlier, that very very few people have the ability to identify what goes on subconsciously, even if someone spends 40 minutes analysing and exposing every single cue in a two minute argument, you simply will not get it - yet what you will do (and have done) is exactly what Hannity is an expert on. You will implant wedges into readers minds by saying statements like "Is he qualified, or just another CT Nut". By saying something like this, what you are feeding into the reader's mind is that one is automatically a "nut" if they aren't able to show you their Diploma.
 
Last edited:
This video perfectly demonstrates the key point that in two sides of a war/debate there doesn't have to be a 'good guy'.

IS & racial Islam are wrong for targeting civilians & attempting to force an unwanted & socially regressive system onto the world.

The west (Notably the US) is wrong for killing thousands of civilians (most of which are Muslims) using drones, air-strikes & it's unfettered support for the state of Israel. The extremism is a predictable response to abuse, we can condemn the underline causes of the extremism and the extremism when it manifests. Both are undesirable & both cause needless human suffering.

Both sides of the debate are blind to the actions of the factions they support.
 
asim18 said:
What? :confused:

Firstly you don't have to be a qualified psychoanalyst to be able to pick out a bull*****er, rather have experience communicating with lots of different people. I pick up on the crap Hannity uses every other day, its not some secret.

Secondly, he's not conspiring against anyone or anything. The actions of Hannity are there in video and are being explained on the fly.

Again, absolutely astounding how you manage to think that the person providing an analysis is a "conspiracy nut" even though the powers of the subconscious mind are well studied and documented.

However, your comment simply proves what I said earlier, that very very few people have the ability to identify what goes on subconsciously, even if someone spends 40 minutes analysing and exposing every single cue in a two minute argument, you simply will not get it - yet what you will do (and have done) is exactly what Hannity is an expert on. You will implant wedges into readers minds by saying statements like "Is he qualified, or just another CT Nut". By saying something like this, what you are feeding into the reader's mind is that one is automatically a "nut" if they aren't able to show you their Diploma.
Click to expand...

ever wondered if some people on the net are paid disinformation trolls?
 
they're both trolls appealing to two different subsets of retarded people... fundamentalist-full-retard right wing Christians and Jews + fundamentalists-full-retard-muslims.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom