I think the only reason why I would consider buying an HDD this late in the day would be for archive storage.
I think the only use for spinning rust is for storage and archival, using an SSD for the operating system and software. It's what has worked best for me for some time now.
Is SSD reliability still an issue? I'm currently using a 1TB SSD as my boot drive, but a 2TB WD HDD for all videos/temp files/downloads etc to preserve SSD writes.
I would like to make the move to a full SSD system as I hate the HDD noise, but of course, I'm also worried about lifespan!
Is that despite heavy SSD usage?I don’t think SSD reliability has been an issue in years. I’ve had a Crucial M500 in my home/gaming PC years now and it hasn’t missed a beat. Still scores 100% in drive health tests. All the various Mac-based systems I built and operated over a decade had at least one SSD inside and I never had a drive issue. These were the OEM drives Apple uses, so possibly the cheapest SSD that Samsung could build and nothing fancy.
I am surprised by the comments not blaming Windows. Especially as you never see Linux run like a dog like this.
Linux is based on Unix where systems are typically on 24/7. That other Unix-based consumer OS, MacOS, has also switched to SSDs.
I recently used a Windows PC with a HDD. Wasn't a great experience.