Associate
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2019
- Posts
- 308
- Location
- Milton Keynes
Me making a change, wont make a blind bit of difference.More whataboutism. Make the change and others will follow.
Me making a change, wont make a blind bit of difference.More whataboutism. Make the change and others will follow.
he ain't lying though is he?I wondered how long before we got some whataboutism, thats what these threads always descend into.
Me making a change, wont make a blind bit of difference.
Yeah this definitely needs to be made more clearer. And councils need to stop being lazy with specific plastic that they'll only accept.
Frankly i think there should at least be a law passed to outline which recyclable plastics can be used, and at least that way all councils have to take it for recycling.
More like countless billions of people who think like me, and i know its the wrong way to think about it.Of course it will, there are countless millions of people who wrongly think like you do, if they all made little changes it adds up to big differences.
Whilst it's important to "do your bit" never fool yourself into thinking that the absolute tiny amount of good being done will offset the crap thats created by places like India and China.
Again, its great to do your bit but don't think you're saving the planet.
No
Because Im not easily influenced by what the media tell me.
Yeah blame the poor man for destroying the planet when corporations have done most of the damage....
IE Deforestation
Oil spills in oceans
Plastic being dumped
Dangerous chemicals being disposed of in bodies of water (As a recent example a corp was recently found to of been disposing anti depressant medication into water and making the fishes act loopy)
That's where i believe it should be the corporations that should be forced to change and not the individual, the average individual doesn't care what their products are packaged in as long as the product is still edible/usable once bought.They wouldn't do the damage they do if there wasn't the demand for their products. For example, if people completely stopped buying salad in plastic bags, corporations would have to change. Unfortunately the consumer is typically greedy and lazy and has come accustomed to 'putting it in the bin' and letting someone else deal with the problem.
That's where i believe it should be the corporations that should be forced to change and not the individual, the average individual doesn't care what their products are packaged in as long as the product is still edible/usable once bought.
Agreed. But they won't. And Governments won't force them because globalisation is a corrupt mess. I strongly believe that the only way they'll change is when their customers leave them.
The recent increase in media attention towards environmental problems has changed my outlook on my daily life quite a lot.
I always recycled but now I'm more stringent with myself and I'm becoming far more resentful of the throwaway culture we have naturally developed. This especially comes to the fore at birthdays and Christmas when I look at the millions of toys my children have and ponder what else I can get them (that they won't play with once the week's out). Parents of GD, what have you done in this case? I'm thinking of switching to monetary gifts.
The largest impact has been buying antiques, though. Collecting weaponry has long put me into that world but I never really noticed, until recently, the rest of the stuff on offer and I'm quite kicking myself after decking the house out in sterile Ikea. I can get amazing craftsmanship, character, and a huge dose of history for less than what the high streets ask in most cases but it's also the ultimate in recycling. The lack of sweatshops is also a bonus.
How about you chaps?
Globalism has very little to do with corruption, do you really think it'd be any different had there been serious protectionism instead? The corruption would simple have been more local.
Globalism is simply the economic policy of sharing employment, boosting less fortunate countries closer to consumers rather than producers and i'm sure other myriad descriptions fit, it's not liberal, it's not conservative, it simply is. The power is still ultimately in the hands of the consumer whether they'll consume the luxury or not, nobody forces people to want things. A boycott of consumption would never go down well considering how important it is for the economy, it literally is the economy.
Having kids is the absolute worst thing you can do for the planet.
Those who don't have kids but also want them make the biggest sacrifice. I myself don't want them.
Do you buy loose fruit and veg?
The scale, size and reach of the companies is a big part of the problem though.