Hybrids get a lot of hate from the new generation of road cyclists, all of whom will insist at great length that you should buy a CX (cyclocross) bike instead. It's bizarre.
Hybrids are great bikes for normals who want to potter round their local area. They offer the sit-up position with a good view around that the casual cyclist craves, while being much less draggy than a mountain bike, and a lot of them are better offroad than a CX bike. Virtually all of my non-cycling (and by this I mean they don't consider a 60 mile club ride a "nice little potter") friends who ride have hybrids and they couldn't be happier.
Basically cyclists are rubbish at recommending bikes other than the type they understand. It's like asking your mate who's into 2 seater sports cars which MPV you should buy.
Exactly my thoughts on it. You can't take people on a cycling forum as being the norm when saying "everyone upgrades so it is a waste of money". You simply aren't going to get people who say "just thought I'd check in to a cycling enthusiasts forum to let you know that I'm perfectly happy with my hybrid that I use to do 15 miles once or twice a week in the summer" but these people exist in huge numbers!
I also think it is a bit dangerous saying to non cyclists about the off road abilities of cx bikes. Head down position and drop bars take more skill to handle off Road than flat bars with a sit up position.
Value for money at the bottom end gets you a less compromised hybrid compared to a road bike. A couple of hundred quid gets you a hybrid with proper group set (tourney is fine on an entry level hybrid) the same budget on a road bike gets you stem shifters!
Last edited: