jcb33 said:Well we have a) 0.71, b) 7.81, c) 5, we just dont know how to do D

But how can we get that without the graph, thats what we need to do *sighs*Zefan said:You'll have to use the equation and the distances between the points together, not sure really what you'll have to do with them but that's basically it.
Just use Billy's graphical solution it gives you the exact answer.
Had a go in paint with all the stuff up the right way and worked it out to be about 6.2, 3.3 so it seems good to me![]()
jcb33 said:But how can we get that without the graph, thats what we need to do *sighs*
jcb33 said:But how can we get that without the graph, thats what we need to do *sighs*

)We just have to find 1 line, not the intersect point of 2?touch said:No idea, but i'v wasted 8 sheets of A4 trying
(and i dont see how your answer for A can be a single number?)
jcb33 said:We just have to find 1 line, not the intersect point of 2?
DaveF said:You want to do this all parametrically.
Equation of the line is x = 3+7t, y = 2+3t. (Then 3x-7y = 9+21t-14-21t = -5 is a cartesian equation of the line, if you care).
Separation at start = sqrt(5^2+6^2) = sqrt(61).
Separation at collision is 5 (sum of the radii).
For the last part: using the parametric equation, separation in x is (8-(3+7t)) = 5 - 7t; separation in y is 8-(2+3t) = 6 - 3t.
If S is the total separation, then S^2 = (5-7t)^2+(6-3t)^2 = 25-70t+49t^2+36-36t+9t^2 = 58t^2 - 106t + 61.
The balls collide when S^2 = 25: i.e. 58t^2-106t+36 = 0 or 29t^2-53t+18 = 0
t=(53+/- sqrt(53^2-4*18*29))/56 = (53 +/- 26.851)/58. Since we want the first point where S^2 = 25, we take t = (53 - 26.851)/58 = 0.451
Substituting back, we get x = 3+7*0.451 = 6.157, y = 2+3*0.451= 3.353
Check: distance^2 = (x-8)^2+(y-8)^2 = 3.397 + 21.594 = 24.991 (close enough to 25 considering we've only been working to 3dp).
Tough, because that's the standard algorithm.jcb33 said:Thats to complicated for my brain,