Associate
- Joined
- 8 Oct 2005
- Posts
- 604
The 2560*whatever image is quite clearly just an upscaled/resized version of the one in OP's post and there is no detail whatsoever in it. I doubt the photographer had a huge resolution file available on the internet and it's very possible that this image is owned by one of the various stock photo sites.
Fair point - I hadn't looked in detail - looking it on my screen (which is another point*) it would be pretty terrible as any kind of print at that quality.
*I am breaking copyright if I have it as my wallpaper, what about if I leave it open in chrome on my 2nd screen and other people view it there, or save it to my phone etc etc etc? Sorry just a random thought, maybe points to the lack of understanding/ignorance (clarity) of our copyright laws.