I suggest you don't change anything in your setup and just run it like for like, then when it outperforms XP you can't just say "oh it must just be the extra RAM"
i've hardly found vista to hog any RAM and i only have 2gig in my computer, people seem to have heard to many stories about it before knowing any facts
If you really want to buy some extra sticks that's up to you, but at least try it without the extra ones in. It will take 5 seconds to put them in after you've tested it with 2gb
your the biggest fail, this is definetly what the forum doesnt need another know it all who doesnt know jack. when u quoted and said no it doesnt for cpu u couldve just wrote that for the quote above, but no u wanted it to be like an extra point against him, just do us a favour and log out tbh.....YOU DONT know NOTHING.
once you get used to it vista is just a nicer OS to use IMO, it also seems to run just as smooth as xp.
having said that ive been back on XP for a couple of months now because my wifi adapter doesn't want to work on Vista x64. I don't think the memory argument will stand up though as thats an x64/x86 issue and nothing to do with it being xp or vista.
And the same was ture before, Win 98 ran faster than XP but people still made the change. You will be using Vista sooner or later its just a matter of time.
And the same was ture before, Win 98 ran faster than XP but people still made the change. You will be using Vista sooner or later its just a matter of time.
your the biggest fail, this is definetly what the forum doesnt need another know it all who doesnt know jack. when u quoted and said no it doesnt for cpu u couldve just wrote that for the quote above, but no u wanted it to be like an extra point against him, just do us a favour and log out tbh.....YOU DONT know NOTHING.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.