Help with ping/latency issues

Ad_Augendae said:
QOS may help, I can't see any of your graphs though, maybe my add-blocking might be causing that. (anybody re-poste a pic for me)
FQ_Codel helps me get better usage from my 250/25 VM connection, although in your use case I wouldn't recommend what I use router wise.
My graph using wifi is here with QOS enabled https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=b096994b-1f0a-454f-926b-c8e70ecce1e7
Click to expand...
oops - my mistake! Here you go! https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broa...755e3e20fe9c7225f6e4f5adb8873e6b3e-16-04-2024

old Hub3 BQM - ignore from 2pm: https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broa...hare/acd97c5d06d3658d22042865b74f9644f7a13e99
 
Last edited:
RT123 said:
oops - my mistake! Here you go! https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broa...755e3e20fe9c7225f6e4f5adb8873e6b3e-16-04-2024

old Hub3 BQM - ignore from 2pm: https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broa...hare/acd97c5d06d3658d22042865b74f9644f7a13e99
Click to expand...
Thanks, like all things it depends on the area and usage, just because FTTP is available doesn't always mean it will be better. In most cases yes, ask around is your best bet.
For me QOS does help but for that you want a router with at least a quad core 64 bit processor with easy to implement QOS options. As for your graphs you seem to have a little packet loss, nothing major atm. But something to keep an eye on. Have a mooch at the router stats and see if you have any uncorreted errors (post RS errors) or T3/T4 timeouts 192.168.0.1 IE you shouldn't have loads for just a short period.
 
Ad_Augendae said:
Thanks, like all things it depends on the area and usage, just because FTTP is available doesn't always mean it will be better. In most cases yes, ask around is your best bet.
For me QOS does help but for that you want a router with at least a quad core 64 bit processor with easy to implement QOS options. As for your graphs you seem to have a little packet loss, nothing major atm. But something to keep an eye on. Have a mooch at the router stats and see if you have any uncorreted errors (post RS errors) or T3/T4 timeouts 192.168.0.1 IE you shouldn't have loads for just a short period.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I haven’t checked the new one yet but there were thousands of PostRS errors in the channels and some T3 Timeouts on the old router.
 
Last edited:
FYI, I'm following along, this has been up for 50 days just for a comparison.

ChannelLocked StatusRxMER (dB)Pre RS ErrorsPost RS Errors
1Locked402341163
2Locked402150
3Locked402240
4Locked401920
5Locked402090
6Locked402110
7Locked402350
8Locked402280
9Locked402170
10Locked402170
11Locked402160
12Locked402660
13Locked402720
14Locked402060
15Locked401750
16Locked401240
17Locked40960
18Locked40960
19Locked40890
20Locked40930
21Locked411350
22Locked411810
23Locked411390
24Locked411830
25Locked411930
26Locked411900
27Locked411480
28Locked411440
29Locked411680
30Locked412110
31Locked412480

Yours is a mess!
 
No - just the Hub. Decided there were no issues with the cable (tbh I'm still unclear on what the engineer on Saturday's thoughts were).
 
Last edited:
Ive had issues like this previously and they said the power levels were too high and just added more attenuators to the line. I don't think some of the lower level techs really know whats going on. You might find that your cable is damaged and is intermittent, like it has a hole in the insulation and is letting water in. Can you inspect the cable as far as you can see?
 
The power levels are fine (verified myself using the logs)

As far as I can tell, the cable looks fine (but i'm probably not very good at identifying that kind of thing)
 
Last edited:
new.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom