High income child benefit charge...oh ****

Soldato
Joined
13 Feb 2012
Posts
5,777
Just to clarify, the potential penalties and interest are:
  • A penalty for failure to notify (hopefully this won't be charged),
  • A penalty/penalties for late payment, (30 days late = 5% of tax owed, 6 months late = another 5%, 12 months late = another 5%)
  • Interest charged from the date it was due to be paid until the date you actually pay the tax.
Until you receive any written information from HMRC take anything told on the phone with a pinch of salt as they may be paraphrasing. What I've said above is just to give you pre-warning.

Note - there's also penalties for filing a tax return late, however, if you haven't had a notice to file yet then there shouldn't be any penalties.

Sounds like I have received more poor communication from HMRC. Not surprising.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2005
Posts
5,996
Location
Essex
I imagine for the majority of people "a reasonable excuse for not telling us about the charge" will be they had no bloody idea this charge was a thing. This is supported by the fact they got a letter, and they acted because they were now aware. Whether they see that as reasonable I don't know, but I can bet that majority of people will be saying this when asked and it won't be a surprise to HRMC, hence the need for a letter in the first place.

Ignorance of the law generally isn't a defence. If you challenge the penalty to a Tribunal you're basically playing lucky dip as to whether you get the few judges who are prepared to accept that as a reasonable excuse (can't remember if the issue has gone to a higher court yet, it may have done). Also, HMRC are a tax collection and management section of the government, it's not actually their responsibility to keep people up to date with tax rules.

Sounds like I have received more poor communication from HMRC. Not surprising.

They may well do as they communicated, although in the tax world I find it better to be aware of the different outcomes just in case you get a letter that doesn't tie in to what you were led to believe.

For anyone getting these charges be aware as well that it is possible to arrange payment plans with HMRC, if you want to do a payment plan do so promptly (i.e. before you are meant to make any payment) and stick to anything you agree.
 

LiE

LiE

Caporegime
Joined
2 Aug 2005
Posts
25,646
Location
Milton Keynes
Ignorance of the law generally isn't a defence. If you challenge the penalty to a Tribunal you're basically playing lucky dip as to whether you get the few judges who are prepared to accept that as a reasonable excuse (can't remember if the issue has gone to a higher court yet, it may have done). Also, HMRC are a tax collection and management section of the government, it's not actually their responsibility to keep people up to date with tax rules.

Yep I get that, but the fact this letter has been sent out to a lot of people tells me there was an issue with this being communicated, otherwise we would all be aware and no letter would be needed. I wouldn't fight them on a penalty, I'm just hoping they see some sense when it comes to "reasonable excuse" part of the letter.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2005
Posts
5,996
Location
Essex
Yep I get that, but the fact this letter has been sent out to a lot of people tells me there was an issue with this being communicated, otherwise we would all be aware and no letter would be needed. I wouldn't fight them on a penalty, I'm just hoping they see some sense when it comes to "reasonable excuse" part of the letter.

The point I'm making is that there isn't really any issue with communication (at least between yourself and HMRC) because HMRC aren't responsible for communication. There's probably issues with internal HMRC/DWP data reconciliations (bane of my life is the lack of government data sharing) leading to a gap in communication to you about it, but ultimately it isn't actually HMRC's responsibility to tell you that you're taxable, it's your responsibility to tell HMRC.

The reason I'm labouring the point is that it ties in to reasonable excuse, i.e. what is your reasonable excuse for not telling HMRC about your liability to the charge.
 
Associate
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Posts
457
Location
Essex
In my experience of this, HMRC have been fairly reasonable about this if, on responding to this letter you call them up and explain you were not aware of the charge and tell them you need to do tax returns and for which years. They will then issue to notices to file (3 months to do so) and then you fill them in, file them, and pay the tax. They normally waive the penalties and interest.
 

LiE

LiE

Caporegime
Joined
2 Aug 2005
Posts
25,646
Location
Milton Keynes
The point I'm making is that there isn't really any issue with communication (at least between yourself and HMRC) because HMRC aren't responsible for communication. There's probably issues with internal HMRC/DWP data reconciliations (bane of my life is the lack of government data sharing) leading to a gap in communication to you about it, but ultimately it isn't actually HMRC's responsibility to tell you that you're taxable, it's your responsibility to tell HMRC.

The reason I'm labouring the point is that it ties in to reasonable excuse, i.e. what is your reasonable excuse for not telling HMRC about your liability to the charge.

Spoken to HMRC and they were understanding and there will be no penalties. They did say that my reason wasn't reasonable enough for them to waiver the penalty. However since the earlier years the charge is 0% and 17/18 they can still issue a return, there would be no penalty. Part of this is due to "coming forward" which is used as evidence that you aren't trying to skirt away from paying.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
I received child benefit when the kids were 14-15 bad 2 yrs .. 9 yrs later I had a letter stating they wanted it all back ..
tried to fight it ..got stuck with a bill for 2.5k
hmrc at it's best

Eh? so this was pre-2013?

Did you and your partner both claim it after having split up or something? It was only means tested as of 6 years ago AFAIK.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Jul 2003
Posts
6,257
Location
There's a voice that keeps on calling me.
Spoken to HMRC and they were understanding and there will be no penalties. They did say that my reason wasn't reasonable enough for them to waiver the penalty. However since the earlier years the charge is 0% and 17/18 they can still issue a return, there would be no penalty. Part of this is due to "coming forward" which is used as evidence that you aren't trying to skirt away from paying.

I had the same convo with them this morning. they can work out payment plans, so hopefully it wont be too bad to pay it back. For 18/19 i have to fill out a self Assesment before the end of Jan 2020, thats the one thats going to hurt as we had child no 3 by then lol. I will keep claiming, but i'll just put the money in a seperate account.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,536
The child benefit scam.

I still claim it even though I have to pay all of it back. I believe that claiming it is the only way for your children to be issued with an NI number at 16. If you don't claim, you have more hoops to jump through at that point.

The problem with being forced to take something I don't want is that it gives the HMRC a big chance to mess up every year... and that they have done consistently. It's a complete lottery as to what tax code I'll be issued with after doing the self assessment. Speaking to HMRC is also a lottery - you never get the same response twice.
 
Associate
Joined
6 Jan 2006
Posts
479
In my experience of this, HMRC have been fairly reasonable about this if, on responding to this letter you call them up and explain you were not aware of the charge and tell them you need to do tax returns and for which years. They will then issue to notices to file (3 months to do so) and then you fill them in, file them, and pay the tax. They normally waive the penalties and interest.
I've received a letter too and called them up. They went through a set of questions to decide whether they were going to fine me and luckily the answers I gave (which were all honest) mean I have no penalty charge. I do have to pay back the last 4 years worth though :mad:. Luckily we never spent it and just put it to one side so no major issue.

As someone earlier has said, I'll continue to claim it and pay it back through a tax return. Circumstances can change so I'd rather not have to re-apply if my salary suddenly dropped. There's also the (small) benefit of earning some interest on it throughout the year before paying it back again at the end of the tax year.

It is more than a little frustrating that two people can earn £49k pa and still receive the full amount but one salary of £60k with the other being zero would receive nothing.
 
Associate
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Posts
457
Location
Essex
I've received a letter too and called them up. They went through a set of questions to decide whether they were going to fine me and luckily the answers I gave (which were all honest) mean I have no penalty charge. I do have to pay back the last 4 years worth though :mad:. Luckily we never spent it and just put it to one side so no major issue.

As someone earlier has said, I'll continue to claim it and pay it back through a tax return. Circumstances can change so I'd rather not have to re-apply if my salary suddenly dropped. There's also the (small) benefit of earning some interest on it throughout the year before paying it back again at the end of the tax year.

It is more than a little frustrating that two people can earn £49k pa and still receive the full amount but one salary of £60k with the other being zero would receive nothing.

Yep, super annoying. You can earn more than £60k and not pay it all back. If you have salary sacrifice, and contribute a big chunk to your pension, and buy extra holiday (again, sacrificing pay), and/or have childcare vouchers you can get your 'taxable pay' down to below £60k and keep some of the child benefit. For a couple of years I avoided paying any back by wacking money into my pension but circumstances changed and now i have to file tax returns and pay back most of it.

The other reason to claim it, and this is important, is that if one of the parents is not working, they should claim it as it counts towards NI contributions and your NI record for state pension. My wife claims it, I pay most of it back. She feels its her money to spend on uniforms, bits for the kids etc, I just keep quiet.

Edit: holiday not holding
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
11 Apr 2006
Posts
827
Location
Yorkshire
Anyone earning over £50k, why are you taking higher rate income instead of banging it all in pension?

Tactically it’s better to remain in the basic rate band especially if claiming child benefit. You’ll only see 48p out of every pound anyway (40% + 12%) NI. Much better to see the whole £1 in pension.
 

LiE

LiE

Caporegime
Joined
2 Aug 2005
Posts
25,646
Location
Milton Keynes
Anyone earning over £50k, why are you taking higher rate income instead of banging it all in pension?

Tactically it’s better to remain in the basic rate band especially if claiming child benefit. You’ll only see 48p out of every pound anyway (40% + 12%) NI. Much better to see the whole £1 in pension.

It needs to be a balance. If you earn £70k, no use “banging” 20k in a pension each year only to find you have to make a few cut backs. £50k doesn’t go that far these days and it also depends if you’re the sole earner in a family.
 

Jez

Jez

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,073
Anyone earning over £50k, why are you taking higher rate income instead of banging it all in pension?

Tactically it’s better to remain in the basic rate band especially if claiming child benefit. You’ll only see 48p out of every pound anyway (40% + 12%) NI. Much better to see the whole £1 in pension.
You are absolutely right, everybody in a position to do so should always contribute to their ceiling. Remember though, that this is limited to £40k/annum/~£1m lifetime and therefore is not a solution for everyone.

As you asked a direct question wondering why people wouldnt do this, personally i have no way to strip back my income as far as £50k/annum, so i am left at higher marginal rates unfortunately, along with the loss of CHB.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
Anyone earning over £50k, why are you taking higher rate income instead of banging it all in pension?

Tactically it’s better to remain in the basic rate band especially if claiming child benefit. You’ll only see 48p out of every pound anyway (40% + 12%) NI. Much better to see the whole £1 in pension.

Depends how much more than 50k you earn and where you live etc.... It could make sense for a bit if you’re not earning a huge amount over it and 50k is enough to live on etc...

That’s probably more applicable up north and/or in some situation where your mortgage payments are low etc...
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Feb 2006
Posts
6,044
Location
Beds
I cancelled mine after a year as it worked out i would pay the lot back. All the years of rubbish pay i then grab a decent paid job 6 months after my daughter was born so get nothing :(

I had a mate who was doing the self assessment for years and he kept getting told he didn't need to do it. He stopped and subsequently got fined and sent a bill for several thousand pounds.
 
Back
Top Bottom